Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2017

Proposed legislative changes to the undoubtedly opaque and ambiguous Section 6

Unless and until the High Court resolves the uncertainties around section 6, legislative reform is the only way forward.

AustraliaInsurance

"... ambiguity may be its only clear feature..."

– Kirby P of the NSW Court of Appeal (as he then was) in McMillan v Mannix (1993) 31 NSWLR 538.

24 years later, the ambiguity plaguing Section 6 of Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) remains as ambiguous as ever.

Section 6 was described as "at best opaque" by the NSW Court of Appeal in Chubb Insurance Co of Australia Ltd v Moore [2013] NSWCA 212 (Chubb v Moore). The Court of Appeal called for section 6 to be repealed altogether or completely redrafted in an intelligible form, so as to achieve the objects for which it was enacted.

But all this is possibly about to change. On 19 December 2016, the Attorney General released Report 143 – Third party claims on Insurance Money: Review of section 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (Report 143) in which the NSW Law Reform Commission proposed legislative changes to section 6 which would set reform in motion.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from