Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 APRIL 2013

Proportionate Liability And Arbitrations – No Dice

The WA Supreme Court has held that the proportionate liability regime does not apply to commercial arbitrations.

AustraliaInsurance

On 29 November 2013, the Western Australia Supreme Court found that the proportionate liability regime does not apply to commercial arbitrations.

Justice Beech determined the question (at least in part) in the case of Curtin University of Technology v Woods Bagot Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 449.

This decision is significant for:

  • Contracting parties in determining what method of dispute resolution should be included in contracts, particularly where that party assumes a liability greater than it would ordinarily assume such as a lead design consultant
  • Professionals and professional indemnity insurers in that a professional, having agreed to arbitrate a dispute, will be placed in a significantly different position to that which exists where the dispute is before a court or tribunal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from