Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 DECEMBER 2010

Procedural fairness may require cross-examination of claimant

A party to proceedings in the Workers Compensation Commission (WCC) requires leave in order to cross-examine a witness.

AustraliaInsurance
Gerry Tzortzatos
Gerry Tzortzatos

Judgment date: 16 November 2010

Winter v New South Wales Police Force [2010] NSWWCCPD 121

Workers Compensation Commission1

In Brief

  • A party to proceedings in the Workers Compensation Commission (WCC) requires leave in order to cross-examine a witness.
  • Where allegations are made that a witness has been dishonest in relation to a significant aspect of their evidence leave to cross-examine that witness should be granted as a matter of procedural fairness.
  • Similarly in CARS matters where there is a significant inconsistency to which a claimant has not replied, it would be appropriate that the claimant be cross-examined on that issue.

Background

The claimant was a Police Officer who submitted a claim for compensation under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 in respect of a psychological injury arising from various incidents of violence which he witnessed and unsatisfactory treatment at work. The insurer denied liability for the claim substantially on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from