Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2008

More On Proportionate Liability

The decision of Justice Hansen in McAskell v Cavendish Properties Limited [2008] VSC 328 refers favourably to the decision of Justice Byrne in Gunston v Lawley [2008] VSC 97 and provides further guidance on the operation of Victoria's proportionate liability regime under the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic).

AustraliaInsurance
Marcus Saw
Marcus Saw

The decision of Justice Hansen in McAskell v Cavendish Properties Limited [2008] VSC 328 refers favourably to the decision of Justice Byrne in Gunston v Lawley [2008] VSC 97 and provides further guidance on the operation of Victoria's proportionate liability regime under the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic).

Background

Mr and Mrs McAskell, the plaintiffs, owned a residential property in Patterson Lakes, Victoria. The plaintiffs alleged the property suffered foundation subsidence resulting in cracking and deterioration, to the extent that it was necessary to have the property demolished and rebuilt.

The plaintiffs brought proceedings against numerous parties involved in the design and construction of a nearby circulation drain (circulation drain defendants) on grounds that they breached duties of care owed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs also brought proceedings against the builders of the property (the sixth and seventh defendants) (builders) on the basis that they

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from