Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 AUGUST 2017

Meaning Of "Third Party Claim" In A "Claims Made" Policy

HFW
HFW
Contributor
HFW

HFW

HFW is a sector-focused law firm with people who have a real passion for the sectors they work in,...

View firm profile
Explore more from HFW

However, the third party's claim was excluded because it was brought "by" a subsidiary of the director-shareholder.

AustraliaInsurance

Malamit (a project manager) and its directors were insured under a claims-made professional indemnity policy, and was sued in negligence by a related company. The policy defined "claim" as particular proceedings brought by a "third party against the Insured", and excluded claims "by, on behalf of, or for the benefit of any insured, subsidiary, or family member of the insured."

A director and shareholder of Malamit was also sole director and a shareholder of the trustee of the claimant, Treetops, a unit trust. That director-shareholder and his family also held shares in the corporate unit-holders of the trust.

The insurer successfully argued at first instance that the claimant was not a "third party", as defined, and so the claim was not covered, and that the claimant was a subsidiary of the insured, and so any claim by it would be excluded.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from