Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 OCTOBER 2007

McKee v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited

A Review Panel has jurisdiction under s 63 to consider all aspects of the original assessment, not just the material error asserted by the Applicant.

AustraliaInsurance

Background

The NSW Supreme Court handed down its Decision in McKee v Allianz Australia Insurance Limited on 4 October 2007.

The Plaintiff was involved in a motor accident on 9 June 2002 and received injuries to both knees, his left shoulder and his spleen.

The Plaintiff was referred to MAS and Dr Long found 9% WPI. Importantly, Dr Long allowed 0% WPI for the injury to the Plaintiff’s abdomen and spleen.

A Review Application was lodged by the Plaintiff’s Solicitors. They argued that Dr Long should have allowed 3% WPI for the Plaintiff’s post-traumatic splenectomy. The Proper Officer arranged for the Review Application to be referred to a Review Panel.

Whilst the Review Panel agreed that 3% WPI should have been allowed for the Plaintiff’s spleen injury, the Panel found that Dr Long was wrong to allow 8% WPI for the Plaintiff’s left knee injury. Rather, the Panel found that 6% WPI should have been allowed for the knee.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from