Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2009

Legal Directions

Welcome to the final edition of legal directions for the 2009 calendar year.

AustraliaInsurance

By Jeff Kelly, Editor

Welcome to the final edition of legal directions for the 2009 calendar year.

This edition includes:

Personal injury: Do publicans owe a duty to prevent harm to drunken patrons going home?

By Judith Waldock
In the February 2009 edition of Legal Directions, Emily Daffy and Shantini Minjoot discussed a decision of the Tasmanian Full Court which, as they foreshadowed, attracted the interest of the High Court.

Licensee not liable for patrons being shot

By Lupe Ortega
In this decision handed down last month, the High Court held that the licensee of a restaurant was not liable for injuries to its patrons arising from the criminal conduct of a third party, in circumstances in which there was no action the licensee could have taken which would, on the balance of probabilities, have prevented that conduct.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from