Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2009

Insurer not liable for insured's defence costs

This case highlights that the paramount consideration in determining whether a claim falls within the terms of a policy is the nature and not the form of the claim.

AustraliaInsurance

Background

Major held products liability insurance with CGU providing cover for an occurrence caused by an unknown defect in Major's products, pursuant to which CGU was obliged to pay Major's legal costs in respect of such claims.

Major supplied two hydraulic cylinders for a yacht owned by Timelink. The piston rods on the canting keel buckled, broke and caused the keel to detach from the hull during a race resulting in damage to the yacht and consequential loss. Timelink sued Major for damages essentially on the ground that the cylinders were not fit for purpose, that they had relied on Major's skill as a specialist hydraulic engineering company, and that Major had supplied the cylinders which were not appropriate for their intended use. In essence, Major contended that it merely provided a component which it did not design, and which was specified by Timelink's own engineer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from