Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2012

Hail the (Insurance) Fraud Finding

Hall & Wilcox
Hall & Wilcox
Contributor
Hall & Wilcox

Hall & Wilcox

Hall & Wilcox is a leading independent Australian law firm. We are a national firm with eight...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hall & Wilcox

If an insured causes more damage, to write off the vehicle, the insurer can deny the entire claim on the basis of fraud.

AustraliaInsurance
Liam Campion
Liam Campion

On 25 December 2011, a catastrophic hail storm struck metropolitan Melbourne, resulting in widespread property damage. The storm also gave rise to an unprecedented number of fraudulent insurance claims.

Indemnity disputes arising from hail damage claims are usually determined by the Financial Ombudsman Service. In the absence of directly relevant case law there has been uncertainty within the industry as to whether insurers can deny claims with some manufactured 'hail' damage in their entirety, or whether they must pay to repair the proportion of damage that was genuinely caused by hail.

In this unreported decision of the Magistrates Court of Victoria, it was held that an insurer is entitled to deny indemnity on the basis of fraud where an insured claims for manufactured damage, even where there is a relatively high proportion of genuine hail damage.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from