Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2009

Fore! Duty Of Care Issues For Golfers

This case is one which concerns duty of care issues that may arise when a golfer is injured when he/she is struck by a stray ball.

AustraliaInsurance
Marcela Kamada
Marcela Kamada
David Muir
David Muir
Author LinkedIn connections

This case is one which concerns duty of care issues that may arise when a golfer is injured when he/she is struck by a stray ball.

The appellant, Dr Pollard, was injured when he was struck by a golf ball driven by the respondent, Mr Trude, as they and two other men played a round in a club competition. Dr Pollard sustained substantial injury to his right eye, which left him with partial loss of vision.

Dr Pollard alleged that Mr Trude breached a duty of care by failing to warn Dr Pollard that he was about to hit his ball; and by failing to shout "Fore", as opposed to shouting "Watch out", once it was apparent that the ball was heading towards Dr Pollard.

At first instance, Chesterman J found that Dr Pollard failed to establish liability and entered judgment for Mr Trude, holding that Mr Trude was not negligent in not warning Dr Pollard before taking his shot; and that there was no relevant difference between a warning of "Fore" and a warning of "Watch out".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from