Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 JULY 2012

"Footloose backpacker" receives nil for future loss

This case note focuses on the award of quantum, as no damages were awarded to the plaintiff for future economic loss.

AustraliaInsurance

Focus: O'Connell v 1st Class Security P/L [2012] QDC 100
Services: Insurance
Industry Focus: Insurance

O'Connell v 1st Class Security P/L [2012] QDC 100

Introduction

In this case an employer was held vicariously liable for the actions of a security officer/bouncer who broke the Plaintiff's leg whilst 'assisting' police during his arrest. The judgment discussed a number of issues, including whether a battery had occurred and the statutory defences which exist for people who injure others whilst helping police. However, this case note focuses on the award of quantum given that no damages were awarded for future economic loss.

Facts

The Plaintiff was a 24 year old backpacker at the time of the incident, staying in a Brisbane backpacker's hostel. The Plaintiff was drunk and angry about being evicted from his hostel late at night. The Plaintiff remained outside the hostel and upset. Police officers attended and issued a direction to the Plaintiff

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from