Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 MARCH 2010

Duty of Care and the "Salient Features" Test

The NSW Court of Appeal decision in Makawe Pty Limited v Randwick City Council [2009] NSWCA 412 confirms that in cases of a novel relationship, the duty of care is to be determined according to a ‘salient features’ test. The decision also deals with the question of what constitutes pure economic loss and raises the possibility of a new interpretation of section 44 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW).

AustraliaInsurance

The NSW Court of Appeal decision in Makawe Pty Limited v Randwick City Council [2009] NSWCA 412 confirms that in cases of a novel relationship, the duty of care is to be determined according to a 'salient features' test. The decision also deals with the question of what constitutes pure economic loss and raises the possibility of a new interpretation of section 44 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW).

Key points:

  • A duty of care is unlikely to be imposed where there is no connection between the parties.
  • In such cases, a 'salient features' test is to be employed.
  • Structural defects in construction causing economic loss with nothing more is mere economic loss.

Facts

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from