Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JUNE 2015

Claims against insurers and proportionate liability

This case examined claims against insurers under s601AG of the Corporations Act, and the proportionate liability regime.

AustraliaInsurance

Claims against insurers under s601AG of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and application of the Proportionate Liability Regime

In the recent Supreme Court of New South Wales decision of Smart v AAI Ltd; JRK Realty Pty Ltd , The Hon Justice Robert Beech-Jones ("His Honour") examined the prerequisite elements of a claim under s601AG of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("the Act"). In doing so, His Honour also discussed the application of the proportionate liability regime under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (Cth) and the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ("TPA") to the plaintiffs' claims in the proceedings.

BACKGROUND

Between July 2007 and October 2007 the, the plaintiffs, namely Mr Smart and Ms Kanters the sole director of JRK Realty Pty Ltd ("JRK") were persuaded by Mr Lynch, the General Manager of a company named Q1, to transfer a total of $267,000 into Q1's account. Mr Lynch represented that that the monies would then be used either alone or in conjunction with

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from