Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2013

Australia's Bridgecorp appeal handed down

The Chubb Insurance v Moore judgment provides clarity and will be helpful for insurers, insureds and claimants alike.

AustraliaInsurance
Bernadette Carey
Bernadette Carey

In brief - Chubb Insurance v Moore judgment brings welcome clarity

The judgment in Chubb Insurance Company of Australia v Moore is helpful for insurers, insureds and claimants alike. The clarity it brings to what has been a complex and confused area of law will be welcome across the wider insurance industry.

When may charges be asserted over insurance moneys?

On 11 July 2013, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of NSW delivered a much anticipated judgment concerning the operation of section 6 of the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) (Act). In Chubb Insurance Company of Australia v Moore [2013] NSWCA 212 (Judgment), a five judge bench has provided much-needed clarity regarding the proper construction of section 6 of the Act, and the circumstances in which charges may, and may not, be asserted over insurance moneys in reliance on the Act.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from