Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2015

ATE Insurance and security for costs – Will a deed of indemnity suffice?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This case considered if an After-The-Event (ATE) insurer could provide security for costs by way of a deed of indemnity.

AustraliaInsurance

The Victorian Supreme Court recently handed down its decision in DIF III Global Co-Investment Fund LP & Anor v BBLP LLC & Ors which considered whether an After-The-Event (ATE) insurer, based overseas, could provide security for costs by way of a deed of indemnity.

BACKGROUND

The matter concerned an application for security for costs in circumstances where the plaintiffs were not registered in, and had no assets in, Australia.

The parties agreed that the plaintiffs were to provide security however a dispute arose as to the form the security ought to take. The defendants sought security in the usual form, that is, that the plaintiffs either provide a bank guarantee or pay funds into court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from