Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2008

Additional Conditions & Follow Settlement Provisions

In the recent UK decision of Aegis Electrical & Gas v Continental Casualty [2007] EWHC 1762, the Commercial Court considered how the reference to underlying policy terms in a reinsurance slip affects the scope of reinsurance cover, and whether follow the settlement provisions bind a reinsurer to a settlement where the cover is not back-to-back.

AustraliaInsurance
David Speiser
David Speiser

In the recent UK decision of Aegis Electrical & Gas v Continental Casualty [2007] EWHC 1762, the Commercial Court considered how the reference to underlying policy terms in a reinsurance slip affects the scope of reinsurance cover, and whether follow the settlement provisions bind a reinsurer to a settlement where the cover is not back-to-back.

Facts

The reinsured (the Syndicate), sought to recover from the defendant reinsurer, Continental Casualty Company (CCC), for settled claims arising from incidents at an oil refinery in the South Caribbean. The incidents involved damage to certain components of the insured's (Aegis) oil refinery including the 'Visbreaker unit' and the 'D1A reactor'.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from