Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 AUGUST 2020

Not from the company: Liquidators fail to claw back third party payment

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Recent decision takes away uncertainty in relation to third party payments & the operation of the unfair preference regime.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

This week's TGIF considers the decision in Cant v Mad Brothers Earthmoving Pty Ltd [2020] VSCA 198, where the Court of Appeal refused to find that a payment made by a third party on behalf of an insolvent company was an unfair preference.

Key takeaways

  • To be an unfair preference, a payment from a third party to a creditor must come from money or assets to which the insolvent company is entitled.
  • Moreover, it must have the effect of diminishing the assets of the company available to creditors.
  • If the company directs the third party to make the payment, or authorises or ratifies it, that does not necessarily make the payment 'from the company'.

What happened?

Mad Brothers was an unsecured creditor of Eliana, the company in liquidation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from