Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2021

Cant v Mad Brothers Earthmoving

Discussion about recent case that considered unfair preference claims made to an unsecured creditor.

AustraliaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

BACKGROUND

Cant v Mad Brothers Earthmoving ('Cant') is a Court of Appeal decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria, which considered unfair preference claims made to an unsecured creditor.

Eliana Construction and Developing Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ('Eliana') incurred a debt to Mad Brothers Earthmoving Pty Ltd ('Mad Brothers') totaling $236,952.31.

Prior to Eliana being wound up, the parties agreed that Eliana would pay Mad Brothers $220,000.00 ('Payment') in full and final settlement of the debt. The Payment was made to Mad Brothers by a third-party, Rock Development & Investments Pty Ltd ('Rock Development') using a local loan facility.

Subsequently, Anthony Robert Cant was appointed as liquidator of Eliana. Cant then commenced proceedings against Mad Brothers, claiming the Payment to Mad Brothers was an unfair preference payment and consequently void.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from