Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 NOVEMBER 2011

New debate needed on merits of PPPs

Since their debut in Australia, public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been the subject of heated debate .

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector

This model has been more cost-effective than traditional ones, writes Brad Vann.

Since their debut in Australia, public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been the subject of heated debate – and plenty of criticism. They have been variously described as "shonky", costly, a cash cow for the greedy private sector, and as a way for governments to move debt off their books.

Much of this criticism is misguided and unwarranted.

It is true that some PPP projects have not delivered on investors' and private sector expectations. Mistakes have been made. This does not mean the PPP model itself is flawed or that the private sector should be shut out of infrastructure delivery.

There are many examples of successful PPPs in action – Melbourne's CityLink and County Court projects are just two – which demonstrate the clear benefits of private sector investment in infrastructure – investment that will be needed if Australia is to deliver on its ambitious infrastructure program.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from