Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 SEPTEMBER 2009

Challenge To Validity Of Delegated Legislation Fails

In “Lamason v Australian Fisheries Management Authority” [2009] FCA 245, the Federal Court of Australia considered a challenge to the validity of a provision of a Commonwealth legislative instrument, the “Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2005” (the Plan).

AustraliaGovernment, Public Sector
Dean Kambovski
Dean Kambovski
Ann Dornau
Ann Dornau
Author LinkedIn connections

In Lamason v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2009] FCA 245, the Federal Court of Australia considered a challenge to the validity of a provision of a Commonwealth legislative instrument, the Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery Management Plan 2005 (the Plan).

Background

The Eastern Tuna and Billfish Fishery is one of a number of fisheries managed by the Australian Fisheries Management Authority (AFMA). The Federal Court challenge concerned one aspect of a new management regime, introduced through the Plan, which effected a transition from regulating the take of certain species in the fishery by a system of annual fishing permits to a system based on Statutory Fishing Rights (SFRs).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from