Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 FEBRUARY 2016

Executor told to stop dithering

An executor who decides to apply for Probate needs to prove the Will, not undermine it by introducing contrary evidence.

AustraliaFamily and Matrimonial

In the recent published reasons of Registrar C Boyle in Re Janette Eleanor Counsel; Ex Parte The Public Trustee [2016] WASC 47, the Registrar has reminded practitioners that the obligation on an executor who decides to apply for Probate is to prove the Will, not to undermine it by introducing contrary evidence.

The executor's duty is to propound the instrument which the testator has appointed him to propound. An executor cannot owe any duty to take legal proceedings to destroy the instrument from which he is appointed.

The Registrar noted that "in the first instance, it must be the obligation of the executor to form a judgment about whether to prove a will and in what form. It is the executor who must weigh up any objections that the deceased lacked capacity, or was unduly influenced, or that the will was a forgery. Having made that judgment, the executor must back it by making an application and adducing the evidence in support."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from