Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MARCH 2022

The Murray Darling Basin Plan – courts and water use

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Could the legal validity of the Basin Plan, a statutory plan under the Water Act, be challenged on environmental grounds?

AustraliaEnvironment

The court weighing in on the cancellation of Novak Djokovic's visa was a recent example of how the courts function to keep a check on government power, a process known as "judicial review".

In Djokovic v Minister for Immigration, the Federal Court of Australia held that the power to cancel a visa for "public health, safety and good order" under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) permitted the Minister to cancel Djokovic's visa as an unvaccinated sportsperson. However, migration matters are just one type of executive power that the courts are able to engage with and decide whether a decision was made in accordance with a given law. Water law is an area where courts have a role to play in ensuring that the decisions of the relevant Minister and statutory bodies are consistent with what is authorised by legislation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from