Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2026

New South Wales–No Shortcuts On Scope 3: High Court Puts Scope 3 Emissions Back On The Table For Resource Projects

K&L Gates
K&L Gates
Contributor
K&L Gates

K&L Gates

The Firm K&L Gates is an integrated, international law firm. As a single global law firm, truly...

View firm profile
Explore more from K&L Gates

The High Court of Australia has ruled that NSW planning authorities must consider Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions when assessing resource and energy development applications. In a landmark 3:2 decision, the Court invalidated approval for the Mount Pleasant coal mine extension, establishing that consent authorities cannot fulfill their climate change obligations by examining only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions.

AustraliaEnvironment

On 7 October 2026, the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd v Denman Aberdeen Muswellbrook Scone Healthy Environment Group Inc [2026] HCA 35, confirming how New South Wales (NSW) planning authorities must deal with Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) when assessing development applications for resource and energy projects. By a 3:2 majority, the Court dismissed MACH Energy Australia Pty Ltd’s (MACH Energy) appeal and confirmed that the Independent Planning Commission of NSW ’s (Planning Commission) approval was invalid. The decision makes clear that consent authorities cannot discharge their obligations to consider the impact of development on climate change by considering only Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from