Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2008

Total And Permanent Disablement Not Found: Employee Failed To Attempt To Return To Work

The NSW Supreme Court upheld an insurer's finding that a member of a superannuation fund did not satisfy a Total and Permanent Disablement ("TPD") definition.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Ivan Mabbett v Watson Wyatt Superannuation & Anor [2008] NSWSC 365

The NSW Supreme Court upheld an insurer's finding that a member of a superannuation fund did not satisfy a Total and Permanent Disablement ("TPD") definition. Insurers will welcome a number of the court's findings, including that the member owed the insurer a duty of utmost good faith, even though the member was not a party to the group policy.

Injury Post-Resignation

In July 2001, the member resigned from P&O Cold Logistics ('P&O'). He intended to commence work the next day with Associate Building & Construction ('ABC'). P&O accepted the resignation, but asked the member to complete his shift.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from