Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2026

The Resignation That Wasn’t!

A Fair Work Commission ruling demonstrates that unclear employee statements during emotional or confusing circumstances may not constitute valid resignations. The decision in Jung Hong v Green Drake Pty Ltd examines how language barriers, distress, and ambiguous communication can transform what appears to be a resignation into an employer-initiated dismissal, creating potential liability under the Fair Work Act.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Why the distinction matters?

Employment relationships typically end in one of two ways, either by resignation or by dismissal.

For an employer, resignation of an employee usually comes with significantly less liability or potential repercussions.

By comparison, dismissals, especially where the reasoning is ambiguous or disputable, can expose an employer to claims under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth).

When is a resignation a dismissal?

So, what distinguishes a resignation from a dismissal? Common sense would suggest that a resignation occurs where an employee decides that they no longer wish to continue their employment and communicates that decision to their employer. On that basis, if an employee is asked, “do you want to continue working here?” and the response is “no”, then that would be a resignation, right? Not always.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from