Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2007

Restraint Of Trade - Recent Decisions

Employers are increasingly prepared to seek to enforce restraint of trade clauses against former employees in today's competitive labour market. This is demonstrated in three recent decisions of the New South Wales and Western Australian Supreme Courts. These cases indicate that while the Courts will not enforce unnecessarily broad or uncertain restraints, employees who ignore reasonable restraints or operate under a ‘cloak of deception’ will receive little mercy.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Article by Jessica Paten, Trainee Solicitor

Employers are increasingly prepared to seek to enforce restraint of trade clauses against former employees in today's competitive labour market. This is demonstrated in three recent decisions of the New South Wales and Western Australian Supreme Courts. These cases indicate that while the Courts will not enforce unnecessarily broad or uncertain restraints, employees who ignore reasonable restraints or operate under a ‘cloak of deception’ will receive little mercy.

Woolworths v Banks

(NSW Supreme Court)

Woolworths attempted to restrain Mr Banks, a former executive employee, from accepting employment at Myer for a six month period after leaving Woolworths. It relied on a clause in Mr Banks' employment contract that prevented his employment by a ‘competitive business’ for a period of up to 12 months after his employment with Woolworths ended.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from