Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 APRIL 2009

Refusal To Undergo Medical Treatment In Determining Permanent Impairment

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal has refused to accept an employee’s evidence that she was unwilling to undertake medical treatment when assessing entitlement to permanent impairment compensation.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Andrew Klein
Andrew Klein

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal has refused to accept an employee's evidence that she was unwilling to undertake medical treatment when assessing entitlement to permanent impairment compensation. The Tribunal did not assess the reasonableness of the refusal to undergo the treatment, but instead found that it was likely that she would in fact undergo the treatment in the future.

Background

Ms Newton-Edwards was injured in 2003 whilst she was employed by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. She suffered bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and Comcare accepted liability for the injury. Ms Newton-Edwards claimed that the injury has resulted in the following three impairments (all of which were claimed to be permanent):

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from