Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2017

Mass law firm exodus doused by restraints

The HSF partners sought an urgent injunction to stop the defectors, relying on restraints in two partnership agreements.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

After a coordinated resignation, eight former Herbert Smith Freehills ran FREE for the HILLS (don't you just love puns!) to take up shop at White & Case, a big wig Wall Street firm that's trying to crack our Australian shores.

Stung like spurned lovers, the rest of the HSF partners rushed off to court seeking an urgent injunction to stop the runaway defectors in their tracks, relying on the restraints in two partnership agreements.

We hear that HSF was seeking to enforce 14 clauses across the two agreements, which make us think that someone over there needs to revisit their approach to drafting. However, the restraints essentially boiled down to your typical prohibition on poaching staff and clients, and non-competition that would prevent the former partners from joining a competitor like White & Case for a period.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from