Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2020

Intellectual freedom and serious misconduct: The Free Speech decision

This ruling sets up the potential of a High Court ruling on terminating employees on the basis of their public comments.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Andrew Jose
Andrew Jose

The Federal Court of Australia ("FCA") has set aside a decision by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia ("FCCA") regarding the dismissal of a university academic, raising questions over the line between intellectual freedom and serious misconduct.

The FCA's ruling in James Cook University v Ridd [2020] FCAFC 123 sets up the potential of a High Court ruling on terminating employees on the basis of their public comments. This draws parallels with the recent public discourse on freedom of speech in the context of the termination of Israel Folau's contract.

Background

The academic was a professor who was employed by James Cook University ("JCU") for over twenty-seven years. In 2018 the academic was terminated by JCU for serious misconduct, which was preceded by a series of confidentiality directions and two censures from JCU related to the academic's alleged breaches of JCU's Code of Conduct. The academic claimed in public comments and interviews during

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from