Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2015

Individuals beware: WHS obligations apply to you!

This case is a reminder that compliance with safety obligations is not just the responsibility of the organisation.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Joanne Flitcroft (Formerly With Sparke Helmore Lawyers)
Joanne Flitcroft (Formerly With Sparke Helmore Lawyers)
Laura Dexter
Laura Dexter
Author LinkedIn connections

The first prosecution of an individual under the national harmonised Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) (WHS Act) serves as an important reminder that compliance with safety obligations isn't just the responsibility of the faceless corporation. Although it has always been open to the regulator to pursue individuals for breaches of work health and safety (WHS) law, what individuals are doing (or not doing) to create a safe workplace has recently come into focus.

The message sent by this recent trend is loud and clear—ensuring the health and safety of workers is everyone's responsibility.

The first prosecution – R v Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd [2014]

In the first prosecution of its kind under the WHS Act, charges have been brought against an individual of a defendant company for a workplace incident that occurred in 2012. Mr Al-Hasani has been charged as an "officer" of the defendant company Kenoss Contractors Pty Ltd.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from