Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JANUARY 2012

Enforcing restraint of trade clauses for executives

Two recent NSW decisions have shed further light on the court's approach to enforcing post-employment restraints.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Two recent decisions of the NSW Supreme Court have shed further light on the court's approach to enforcing post-employment restraints.

In Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd v Stacey [2011] NSWSC 1212, the court granted an injunction to restrain two former executives from competing with their former employer even though the restraint period was due to expire the following month. This decision shows that the potential inconvenience suffered by the former employee is not superior to a former employer's right to enforce the restraint. To ensure certainty, any deeds of release entered into with former employers should clearly particularise which obligations will be ongoing.

In Ecolab Pty Limited v Stephen Garland [2011] NSWSC 1095, the court granted an interlocutory injunction that partially enforced post-termination clauses, the consequence being that a former manager was able to continue to work for a competitor of the former employer. The decision shows that it may be more

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from