Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 OCTOBER 2012

Employer's textbook response avoids vicarious liability for sexual harassment

A NSW employer recently avoided vicarious liability for sexual harassment because of its quick investigation response.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Leigh Howard (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Leigh Howard (Formerly With Clayton Utz)
Author LinkedIn connections

Employer's textbook response avoids vicarious liability for sexual harassment

Key Points:

A swift response places an employer in the best position to manage an investigation and should be part of any strategy to minimise any potential vicarious liability.

An employer has recently avoided vicarious liability for sexual harassment because of its quick investigation response. Hughes v Narrabri Bowling Motel Limited [2012] NSWADT 161 has reinforced the importance of a timely response to complaints.

What happened in Hughes?

In Hughes, an employee alleged that she was sexually harassed by the supervisor of a hotel business. One of the three allegations she made before the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal (ADT) was accepted, and the perpetrator was ordered to pay $7,500 damages.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from