Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2014

Controversial Comcare case draws a line for worker's compensation claims

The High Court has made a majority ruling as to what is meant by the expression "in the course of employment".

AustraliaEmployment and HR

IN BRIEF

In a decision which has divided legal opinion, the High Court has made a ruling as to what is meant by the expression "in the course of employment". The High Court considered this expression in the case of Comcare v PVYW [2013] HCA 41 in the context of a workers' compensation claim brought by an employee who was injured during sex in a motel room. The High Court by a majority, upheld an appeal by Comcare and determined that no compensation was payable.

THE FACTS

In 2007 a Commonwealth Government employee was required for work purposes, to travel to a country town and spend the night in accommodation chosen and paid for by her employer. During the stay the employee arranged to meet a male friend who lived in the area for a meal. After enjoying dinner together the employee and her friend returned to the motel. Whilst at the motel the couple engaged in sexual intercourse. In the process, a glass fitting was pulled from its mount which struck the employee

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from