Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2016

Clinical records defeat plaintiff's evidence

The case reinforces the importance of clinical records as a record of a worker's symptoms in serious injury applications.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Philippiadis v Transport Accident Commission [2016] VSCA 1

The Court of Appeal decision of Philippiadis v Transport Accident Commission serves to reinforce the importance of clinical records as an objective record of a worker's symptoms and consequences in serious injury applications.

Despite no adverse findings of credit being made against the Applicant or his wife, the Trial Judge ultimately preferred the clinical records as a reliable record of the Applicant's symptoms. However, while courts are not bound to prefer the evidence of a general practitioner; in many serious injury applications where no attack is made on the Plaintiff's credibility, a general practitioner's evidence about symptoms and restrictions will be given considerable weight.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from