Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JUNE 2020

Are actors independent contractors or employees?

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The Federal Court rejected the appeal by three actors to be deemed casual employees rather than independent contractors.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

In the recent case of Jensen v Cultural Infusion (Int) Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 358, the Federal Court rejected the appeal by three actors to be deemed casual employees rather than independent contractors – a decision that will have wide-ranging implications for the live performance industry.

The facts

The actors were engaged by the production company Cultural Infusion to participate in a government-commissioned theatre production that subsequently performed at more than 100 venues over 100 days between July 2014 and June 2015.

During negotiations for contract renewal, the actors argued their roles were more similar to that of employees than independent contractors and engaged the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) to represent them in the Federal Circuit Court small claims procedures brought under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from