Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2026

AI Slop v Fair Work Com­mis­sion: The Scourge Continues

Recent Fair Work Commission cases reveal how artificial intelligence is undermining legal proceedings, with applicants submitting AI-generated appeals containing fabricated case citations, misapplied legal terminology, and incomprehensible arguments. The tribunal's scathing critiques highlight a growing crisis where uncritical reliance on AI wastes judicial resources and produces submissions devoid of merit.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

For all the talk of how extra­or­di­nary and trans­for­ma­tive arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence (AI) can sup­pos­ed­ly be, it con­tin­ues to be a scourge for the Fair Work Com­mis­sion (FWC). 

In the recent FWC case of Emmanuel Tis­chler v Ava­da Traf­fic Pty Ltd [2026] FWCFB 174, the Full Bench con­sid­ered an appeal in an unfair dis­missal mat­ter ini­ti­at­ed by the Appli­cant employ­ee who had been unsuc­cess­ful at first instance. 

In the brief pub­lished deci­sion, the FWC set out the role AI had in the con­duct of the appeal by the Applicant.

At para­graph 3 the Full Bench noted:

“Mr Tischler’s orig­i­nal notice of appeal con­tained sev­er­al brief para­graphs that did not advance any coher­ent con­tention of error in the Commissioner’s deci­sion.”

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

For further information please contact:

Michael Byrnes, Partner
Phone: + 61 2 9233 5544
Email: [email protected]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from