Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2018

Aggregation of permanent impairment – when is pathology considered the same or identical?

To combine permanent impairment from different injuries, the pathology from each injury must be the same or identical.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Permanent impairment resulting from separate injuries cannot be aggregated or combined to arrive at a higher whole person impairment (WPI), unless the pathology from each injury is identical.

A worker may seek to combine permanent impairment from different injuries to maximise the overall WPI to satisfy a threshold under the Workers Compensation Act 1987 for lump-sum compensation, medical expenses, weekly compensation beyond 5 years or work injury damages.

The law on aggregation has largely been settled since the decision of Department of Juvenile Justice and Edmed [2008] NSWWCCPD 6 ("Edmed"). This decision established that unless a worker suffers the same injury or pathology that is "identical" in each injurious event, the assessment of permanent impairment resulting from the separate injuries cannot be aggregated or combined.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from