Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2010

To ‘477(2B)’ or not to be

Do liquidators have to obtain approval of the court, committee of inspection or the creditors to enter into costs agreements with their lawyers?

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law
Luke Bradshaw
Luke Bradshaw

Do liquidators have to obtain approval of the court, committee of inspection or the creditors to enter into costs agreements with their lawyers?

Yes – according to the NSW Supreme Court judgement handed down in Hutchison v Hillcrest Litigation Services Limited on 23 August 2010 (Hillcrest Proceedings).

Background to the Hillcrest Proceedings

Austin Australia Pty Limited (in liquidation) (Austin) had engaged lawyers to act in arbitration proceedings against the Auburn Council (Auburn Proceedings).

After Austin was placed into administration, Austin's administrators entered into a costs agreement with Austin's existing lawyers in the Auburn Proceedings.

Following the administrators' appointment as liquidators, Austin's existing lawyers continued to act in the Auburn Proceedings.  The liquidators then entered into a litigation funding agreement with Hillcrest and later entered into a second costs agreement with Austin's lawyers.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from