Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2015

There is a right way and a wrong way to handle shareholder disputes

However, part 5.3A of the Corporations Act is not the appropriate mechanism to be used to resolve shareholder disputes.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Points:

Part 5.3A of the Corporations Act is not the appropriate mechanism for resolving shareholder disputes.

Sometimes, being creative with the law can end up creating more problems than it solves.

Take shareholder disputes, for example. The Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) provides three avenues for resolution. Minority oppression cases and the winding up of a solvent company on the just and equitable ground under section 461(1)(k) of the Act requires an application be made to the court and usually, descends into time-consuming and expensive disputes about the facts.

Reference should also be made to the possibility of voluntary liquidation, which does not involve the court but which, like winding up on the just and equitable ground, ultimately involves the company's ceasing to carry on business and being dissolved (which may not be what the parties want).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from