Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2016

Set Offs – a recap

Set off rights can be complex, particularly in equity, and the article highlights a few of the basic set off principles.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

The recent NSW Supreme Court decision of Smith v Acquire Asia Pacific Philippines (Case) examined set off rights in a contractual context. A set off right creates a defence, reducing a claim to the extent of the available set off. Set off rights can be complex, particularly in equity. We will highlight a few of the basic set off principles.

The NSW Civil Procedure Act 2005 (Act) in section 21 creates a statutory right of set off for mutual debts ("debts" are defined as liquidated claims) but not unliquidated claims. A claim for a breach of warranty is an unliquidated claim. This right can be excluded by contract: see subsection (3). Parties can also create set off rights in their contract. The Sale of Goods Act (NSW) allows a buyer to set off a breach of warranty claim against the price: section 54.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from