Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2013

Serving notices by email: As reliable as sending a raven

When commerce is often conducted online, parties to a contract should be able to use email as a method of giving notice.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

From ASOS orders to WhatsApp threads, it's safe to say that we (at least us gen Ys) comfortably communicate online. So why the hesitation to allow notices under a contract to be served by email?

Sure, there are the usual concerns of how to prove receipt of the email in IT terms (did your email make it through the hyper-sensitive quarantine filter?) and getting around ostensible authority with email signatures (surely your computer and email was hacked?); but is this really different to letters lost in the post, forgery or the fax machine spontaneously combusting? We think not.

Two years on from the reforms to the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (NSW) debate ensues over whether an email is as reliable as a fax machine (in any event, many faxes are now sent and received by email). This is a rare example of the law catching up to technology before the masses do.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from