Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MARCH 2012

Recent case a Paradise for Franchisors

The Court supported the view that well worded disclosure documents reduced successful claims for breaches of the Code.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

A recent decision of the Federal Court, Pampered Paws Connection Pty Ltd (on its own behalf and in a Representative Capacity) v Pets Paradise Franchising (Qld) Pty Ltd, has examined the relationship between the disclosure obligations arising under the Franchising Code of Conduct and the prohibition on misleading and deceptive conduct arising under the Australian Consumer Law (formerly known as the Trade Practices Act). It also examined whether a franchise agreement could be legitimately characterised as a sham that essentially camouflaged unlawful tied supply arrangements.

Reassuringly for franchisors, the Court's practical and commercial approach supports the view that well worded disclosure documents supported by quality training programs for franchisee applicants will significantly reduce the risk of successful claims for breaches of the Code or misleading and deceptive conduct claims. The tied supply arrangements were similarly validated, with the franchisee's

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from