Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 DECEMBER 2013

Preliminary agreements: to be or not to be?

Parties to a preliminary agreement are reminded to clearly specify if the agreement is intended to be legally binding.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Points:

A decision of the NSW Court of Appeal reminds parties to a preliminary agreement to clearly specify whether or not the agreement is intended to be legally binding.

Preliminary agreements – such as heads of agreement, letters of intent, letters of comfort and memorandum of understanding – are commonly entered into in commercial negotiations.

A preliminary agreement may outline the commercial intent of the parties, or may set out the commercial framework for a complex deal or transaction, including by specifying agreed principles and a process and timetable for entering into formal transaction documents. Depending on the outcomes sought, the parties may intend that a preliminary agreement is legally binding, or that it simply set out agreements in principle without giving rise to legal obligations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from