Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2012

Franchising: Billy Baxters' case

Franchisors should closely monitor and oversee actions by their representatives in dealing with prospective franchisees.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Background

Billy Baxters is a coffee shop franchise system.

The case of Trans-It Freight Pty Ltd v Billy Baxters (Franchise) Pty Ltd [2012] VCA 71 involves the Billy Baxters' franchisor and its former Glenelg franchisee. The franchisee had terminated their franchise agreement after the business made losses and it was unable to pay the franchise fees. The franchisor sued the franchisee, seeking recovery of unpaid royalties and advertising fees under the franchise agreement.

In the first instance, the Supreme Court of Victoria found against the franchisee who had admitted that $250,000 worth of fees were unpaid. However, the franchisee had also issued a counter-claim, seeking compensation for its losses suggesting that the franchisor's representative had made misleading and deceptive statements before the franchisee signed up to the lease and franchise agreement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from