Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2014

Competing claims to monies held in a retention account (Case Note)

Creditors must ensure that agreements articulate arrangements when funds are to be held on trust for a specific purpose.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

A Supreme Court of New South Wales decision in February 2014 is a timely reminder to creditors to ensure that agreements clearly articulate arrangements where funds are to be held on trust for a specific purpose. The Court revisited the question of the entitlement to retention funds and competing creditor claims in the matter of National Buildplan Group Pty Ltd (subject to deed of company arrangement) (Buildplan)1.

Buildplan was, prior to its administration, involved in the construction of residential, commercial, civil and mining infrastructure projects. Its creditors included employees, secured creditors and unsecured creditors including a large number of subcontractors owed payments for retention monies under the contracts between each subcontractor and Buildplan. Buildplan was engaged by a number of State government entities to undertake design and construction works in respect of various projects in New South Wales. In some cases, these contracts were terminated

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from