Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 AUGUST 2010

Blood on the Boardroom Floor

The Ace Developments decision illustrates the consequences of getting a notice of meeting wrong, and also provides clear rules to follow.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Points:
The Ace Developments decision illustrates the consequences of getting a notice of meeting wrong, and also provides clear rules to follow.

Most boardroom stoushes are resolved out of the public eye. Occasionally, however, they make it into court and, when they do, provide useful lessons for directors and their advisers.

The recent fall-out among the directors of Ace Developments was no exception. Among other things, the resulting court case showed that:

  • a board meeting can be hamstrung if the notice of meeting is too detailed;
  • being disqualified as a director doesn't prevent you voting your nominees onto the board.

This briefing on the case highlights points which will be relevant to corporate counsel and company secretaries.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from