Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MAY 2014

An inconvenient truth with termination for convenience?

Entitlement to terminate a contract for convenience may depend on whether a term of good faith is implied into the contract.

AustraliaCorporate/Commercial Law

Key Points:

Whether a principal is entitled to terminate a contract for convenience may depend on whether a term of good faith is implied into the contract.

Construction contracts often contain provisions enabling termination for "convenience", generally allowing the principal to terminate the contract at will, even where the contractor has not done anything wrong.

A question that often arises in disputes concerning termination for convenience clauses is whether the principal is entitled to terminate the contract when it suits him, for any reason, or no reason at all? In short, is there any fetter on a termination for convenience right? There is no common law right to terminate for convenience. The starting point to examining this question is the termination for convenience clause itself: does the clause prescribe a limit in any way on the basis in which the termination for convenience right may be exercised? It is commonplace for such clauses to require written

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from