Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2013

Dominant message – creating a higher standard for misleading advertising

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Companies will be held to account for producing advertisements where the "dominant message" is or may to be misleading.

AustraliaConsumer Protection

ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (12 December 2013)

Companies advertising and marketing their business were given a reminder by the High Court of Australia recently that they will be held to account for producing advertisements where the "dominant message" is or is likely to be misleading.

The High Court overturned the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court, thereby reinstating the orders of the primary judge in a case where internet service provider TPG Internet Pty Ltd (TPG) was found to have engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct under s 52 and 53 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (TPA), now s 18 and s29 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) respectively.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from