Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2012

All That Glitters Is Not "GOLA"

Division 2 of the Federal Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters upheld the first instance’s decision that ordered a retailer to stop using the trademark "GOLA" and to pay damages.

ArgentinaIntellectual Property
Martin Chajchir
Martin Chajchir

Division 2 of the Federal Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters upheld the first instance's decision that ordered a retailer to stop using the trademark "GOLA" and to pay damages.

D. Jacobson & Sons Limited, owner of the trademark "GOLA," had filed a request for a preliminary injunction against a retailer who was selling counterfeit "GOLA" shoes. Based on Section 50 of the GATT TRIPs Agreement, the Court ordered the defendant to stop using the trademark in question until a decision on the merits of the case was rendered. Moreover, the court officer attached and seized "GOLA" counterfeit shoes. The retailer answered the complaint and argued that the allegedly infringing shoes did not bear the trademark "GOLA" but "GOLD."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from