Pump Court Chambers

pumpcourtchambers.com

Frank Abbott has an extensive practice in criminal and civil law, including negligence fraud, landlord & tenant and animal welfare. Frank’s interest in Animal Litigation sees him regularly giving lectures to the VAAJ. As an active member of the Western Circuit he has been involved in advocacy training for pupils (trainee barristers) for a number of years. He also lectures for the College of Law and other outside training organisations on advocacy. For Netley Police Headquarters he gives courses to new recruits on matters of law and evidence gathering. He has taught advocacy to barristers on the western circuit and abroad in Malaysia and Mauritius.

Timothy Akers is a regulatory and criminal barrister. He is frequently instructed in sensitive and complex inquests, professional discipline matters, and Public Inquiries before the Traffic Commissioners. Tim continues to carry a select portfolio of serious and privately funded criminal cases. As a qualified Solicitor and Solicitor-Advocate, Tim has a wealth of experience in representing lay clients (whether before professional tribunals or at court, at the police station, in prison, or at military bases), and he has been praised by instructing solicitors for the exceptional level of client care that he provides. As a former in-house advocate for the Crown Prosecution Service, Tim has a solid background in case presentation and prosecution work. He is appointed to List B of the List of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law and to the CPS RASSO Panel. He has previously acted on behalf of the CPS Specialist Fraud Division, and has undertaken the role of Legal Professional Privilege Counsel for the Serious Fraud Office on numerous occasions. Tim combines an approachable, down-to-earth style with sound advice and persuasive advocacy. He is a robust opponent who is equally comfortable whether tenaciously advancing the case of his client, or fearlessly protecting the rights of victims and witnesses. He is fully committed to each case he is given and is adept at handling vulnerable clients and witnesses. Tim is a Legal 500 Leading Individual and sits as a Clerk to the Disciplinary Tribunal of CILEx and as a Legal Adviser to the General Optical Council.

Ruth Arlow is a specialist practitioner in Family and Civil law with a particular interest in ecclesiastical law. As an experienced specialist family law practitioner she undertakes all aspects of family work with particular focus on care proceedings and the financial aspects of family provision. Ruth has experience at all levels of court service up to the Court of Appeal.

Mark Ashley has over 20 years experience as a common law advocate. His practice encompasses regulatory, civil and criminal work. His experience across different disciplines of law gives him a breadth of knowledge in matters that complement each other. He is involved in all stages of the legal process, from early advice to promote resolution of disputes, to the preparation of pleadings and advising on evidence, negotiating settlements where possible and conducting trials in court and where necessary providing advice on appeal. Mark is a fully trained Public Access barrister.

Naima specialises in family law, court of protection and public inquiries. She has a keen interest in protecting the rights of vulnerable and marginalised individuals and has been commended for her analytical mind and ability to draw out the essential points of a case. Naima is dual qualified, having obtained rights of audience in the High Court of Pakistan in 2015. Alongside her core practice, Naima maintains a particular interest in cases concerning human rights and social justice issues and has been involved in capital cases before the senior courts in Pakistan. Naima is a member of the Centre for Women’s Justice legal reference panel and a volunteer lawyer for Not Beyond Redemption.

Peter undertakes all areas of general crime, but specialises in serious sex cases, drug conspiracies, honour crime and serious violence. He has an excellent reputation for dealing with sensitive sex cases and particularly cases where the defendant has mental or psychological problems. In addition, Peter is rapidly developing considerable expertise in regulatory crime including road traffic commissioners’ inquiries and offences under environmental law. He is in high demand, his most notable recent cases including the first prosecution in Hampshire for an honour crime which was widely reported: R v Akhtar, Akhtar & Mohammed-Abdul. In 2014 he led the prosecution team in R v Hanif and others, which involved the prosecution of a police officer for misconduct in a public office. In the case of R v Boylan et al, Peter secured the only acquittal in a multi-handed aggravated burglary of a jeweller’s premises. He was also leading prosecution counsel in huge cannabis factory trial resulting in recovery of over £250,000 under POCA. Amongst his busy practice, he has regular appearances in the Court of Appeal including responding to a Criminal Cases Review Commission Appeal.

Siân specialises in extradition and professional discipline while maintaining an established practice in all areas of criminal law. Siân spent 12 months on secondment to the CPS Extradition Unit where she appeared regularly before Westminster Magistrates’ Court representing a variety of Judicial Authorities in Extradition Hearings and acting as a reviewing lawyer for a substantial caseload of Part 1 cases. Since returning from secondment, Sian has obtained Grade 2 on the CPS specialist Extradition panel, in addition to grade 2 in General Crime, and is regularly instructed to appear at both the Magistrates and High Court in extradition matters. Siân represents registrants before a variety of regulators, principally within the healthcare field, in fitness to practice hearings and also has experience of representing prisoners before the Parole Board, including the Claimant in a successful Judicial Review of the Parole Board of England and Wales.

Child Abduction Children Law (Private) Children Law (Public) Direct Access Domestic Violence Family Finance

Andrew Bond is a specialist in the field of Family law, with experience and expertise across a wide range of cases. Andrew only gets involved in more complex private law proceedings, usually involving extra-jurisdictional issues, guardians for the child or children, significant allegations of domestic violence or abuse. He is also instructed in removal from the jurisdiction cases. Andrew’s main instructions come from parents, although he also represents local authorities. He regularly encounters cases of neglect, physical, sexual and emotional abuse. However he also has experience of cases involving placement outside the jurisdiction and is aware of the practical problems, such as international social work assessments and immigration issues, associated with those types of cases.

Edward Boydell KC

Edward Boydell is highly experienced in all aspects of family law but particularly financial remedies (including civil partnerships). He has specific expertise in dealing with complex high-net-worth matters involving family businesses, farms, companies and trusts. He is also very experienced in equitable co-ownership. Particularly well known for his family finance work and recognised in The Legal 500 and by Chambers and Partners as one of the ‘Leaders at the Bar’, he also has a niche civil practice. Notable cases: GS v L [2011] EWHC 2116 (Fam); GS v L [2011] EWHC 1759 (Fam); S v S [2007] EWCA Civ 454; Hill v Hill [1998] 1 FLR 198, CA; Hill v Hill [1997] 1 FLR 730. Edward is head of the Family Finance team and has appeared in numerous cohabitation cases over many years including those under TOLATA, Schedule 1 and other trust of land cases. Edward was appointed a judge of the Financial Remedies Court on its creation and been ticketed to hear financial remedy cases since 2007. He was appointed as a Recorder in 2005 and has been ticketed to hear civil cases since his appointment. Edward is listed as a Leading Silk in Chambers & Partners and Legal 500. Edward regularly sits as a private FDR judge and is ranked by both Chambers and Partners and Legal 500 as a leading private FDR judge.

Helen Brander is a matrimonial finance and cohabitation, and trusts, property, and estates practitioner. She advises and represents individuals and their associated entities (companies, trustee bodies, unincorporated associations) in matters concerning family finance, financial provision for children, the financial aspects of cohabitation, trusts of land, trustee disputes, inheritance and probate disputes. Her work includes: Digital assets, Pre- and post-nuptial agreements, cohabitation and separation agreements, and matrimonial property regimes, consideration of company structures and valuations, trusts of land as between cohabitees, within extended family structures, and as between individuals and companies, the nature of property interests, trusts and family settlements, inheritance disputes and validity of Wills, tax implications of particular transactions, the effect of insolvency on potential transactions, pursuing and securing property and assets, cross-border issues concerning the above. Helen advises, assists and provides representation at any stage of proceedings and welcomes requests for initial advice. She is a firm believer in the benefits of alternative and out-of-court dispute resolution, including mediation and early neutral evaluations / private financial dispute resolution. She conducts private FDRs, ENEs in civil disputes, and arbitrates Children Act 1989 disputes under the IFLA (Children) arbitration scheme. Helen has a professional interest and experience in: the application of family and succession law in Italy and Germany, the experience of expatriate Britons in those countries, and their nationals living in England and Wales. cryptoassets, including cryptocurrency, email accounts, social media accounts, and their relevance, protection and tracing in matrimonial finance and estates. manipulated digital documents and evidence, and their impact in legal disputes. As a result of her historic extensive experience in representing parents and children in both public and private Children Act 1989 proceedings, Helen understands and is able to advise how a particular financial structure or arrangement might impact on other family issues upon which the parties might otherwise litigate. She advises clients sensitively and carefully, remembering always that they are at an extremely vulnerable moment in their lives.

James Byrne is a Barrister specialising in Family law, Housing & Property law and Personal Injury. As a Family law specialist practitioner, James regularly appears in the family court dealing with all private children matters, including cases involving allegations of domestic abuse and parental alienation. He frequently deals with Non-Molestation Orders in the family court and has undertaken work on occupation orders. James receives instructions in housing cases and has undertaken trials for possession orders, applications for anti-social behaviour injunctions and committal proceedings. He has also appeared in cases arguing points of public law, human rights and equality act defences. He has advised on homelessness appeals, unlawful eviction, business tenancies and forfeiture. James acts for both landlords and tenants. Dealing with Business & Property matters and other civil work, James undertakes small claims and fast-track trials in the County Court and has received instructions for the multi-track. James has experience of Fast Track trials in personal injury claims where issues of fundamental dishonesty have been a live issue. James has appeared in the Magistrates’ Court dealing with regulatory matters ranging from environmental prosecutions, taxi licensing appeals and security licensing appeals.

Jesse Cook is known for his personable, down to earth style and his ability to put clients at ease in uncomfortable and stressful situations, which makes him popular with professional and lay clients alike. Before fully qualifying as a barrister, Jesse worked as a paralegal at a West London law firm and enjoyed a successful career in legal recruitment in the City. Whether appearing in the family or county court, or at a tribunal, Jesse provides practical advice on complex legal matters in a simple, straightforward way. He is a robust and able advocate. Family Jesse regularly appears in the family court and has gained experience across a broad range of family proceedings, including family finance and private and public law children matters. He accepts instructions at all stages of proceedings, from first hearing to final hearing. Jesse has also recently been instructed by the Directorate of Legal Services for the Metropolitan Police in relation to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse. Commercial Jesse acts in a wide range of business and contractual disputes, including those involving the sale of goods, the provision of services, unfair terms and debt recovery. He represents private individuals, as well as businesses ranging from SMEs to household names. Employment Jesse appears in Employment Tribunals and Disciplinary hearings across a wide range of industries and sectors. Sports Law In addition to accepting instructions in Chambers’ core areas of work, Jesse has a strong interest in sports law and football matters in particular. He is building his practice in this area.

Lucy Davis enjoys a busy practice specialising in Family Finance and Private Children. Lucy has experience in all aspects of family law, with a particular emphasis on cases involving allegations of emotional abuse and cultural issues. Lucy accepts instructions on a Direct Public Access basis. She appears at all court levels and has a wealth of experience in injunctive relief and emergency applications and undertakes TOLATA matters. Lucy specialises in all areas of matrimonial finance, from needs-based to high-net-worth cases. She has significant experience with pre-marital assets, non-disclosure, company, and pension issues, and regularly handles applications for maintenance pending suit, variation orders, and enforcement. Lucy represents parents, grandparents, and Guardians. She is highly experienced in cases involving parental alienation, neurodivergence, and behavioural issues, with particular expertise in matters relating to autism, ADHD, Narcissistic Personality Disorder, and PDA in both parents and children. In addition to her matrimonial practice, Lucy undertakes cases involving the dissolution of non-marital relationships. Her expertise includes matters such as domestic abuse injunctions, TOLATA claims, and notably, claims made under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989.

Tim’s specialist area of practice is employment law. He has built a strong client base in this field. He is regularly instructed to act for claimants and respondents in complex and multi-day employment tribunal cases. Tim advises on and appears in all types of employment litigation ranging from unfair dismissal, discrimination and equal pay claims in the tribunal, through to employment contract, restrictive covenant/restraint of trade and work reference disputes in the County Court and High Court. In addition, he has considerable experience before the EAT. Clients have commented on Tim’s technical expertise and good cross-examination skills, alongside a thorough knowledge of each case and a reassuring manner. Recent cases of interest include: Flemons & anor v Leepeck Group Ltd & ors: instructed to represent one of the respondent companies in a complex multi-party TUPE case following the liquidation of a PR/advertising company and the formation of two new companies. Successfully argued that there was no relevant TUPE transfer to his client and all claims brought against them were dismissed. Elgar & ors v Millbrook Furnishings Ltd & anor: acted on behalf of ten claimants in a multi-claimant action against their former employers regarding their dismissals following an alleged TUPE transfer (service provision change). Preliminary hearing lasted two days and involved detailed witness and documentary evidence. One of the respondents was represented by a silk. Tribunal found that all but one of his clients’ employment had transferred to the second respondent (decision is now under appeal by second respondent).

Mark Dubbery is the Head of the Inheritance, Wills & Probate team. He is an expert in civil and family law, he is an accredited mediator and a member of the specialist inheritance mediators’ group. He is also an enthusiastic speaker and writer on all his areas of specialisation. Mark is a regular speaker at Chambers’ and external seminars. Contributor to specialist publications on and off line. Speaker, trainer and lecturer at chambers’ events and those arranged for or by solicitors, regional practice groups, HMRC and commercial providers including CLT, CPDcast, MBL and Lips Legal. Notable cases include: Stoker v Rose (Re Krzystofowicz (deceased) [2001] WTLR 883; McMeekin v Long [2003] 29 EG 120; Brown & Ors v Russell Young & Co (a firm) [2006] EWHC 90055 (Costs); Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 938; Broadway v Fernandez [2007] EWHC 684 (Ch); Parris v Williams [2008] EWCA Civ 1147; Kentfield v Wright [2010] EWHC 1607 (Ch).

John Dyer’s practice is principally in criminal defence. He now appears regularly in the Crown Court at the eastern end of the Western Circuit, having previously enjoyed a practice focusing on Bristol, Gloucester, Hereford and Worcester. The majority of defence instructions are for serious violence, serious sexual offences (particularly difficult matters, e.g., historic, rape while asleep), drug production/supply, weapons and fraud, also in cases in which the evidence features forensic material, telephone analysis (messages, cellsite), psychiatric or psychological assessments, accounts, etc. Recent defence appearances include: in 2019, an armed robbery acquittal in which DNA evidence allegedly linked the client to the scene; in 2019, in CACD a reduction in sentence in a case of sexual activity with a child from 14 years' imprisonment to five; in 2021, the attempted importation of 55kg Class A drugs, an attempted murder and a serious s.18 OaPA close to murder; in 2022, in CACD a reduction in sentence in a case of serious sexual abuse of children from 30 years' imprisonment (25 years plus five years' extension) to 27 years (22 years plus extension); in 2023, historic sexual offences involving both doli incapax and the former irrebuttable presumption as to age and the offence of rape. John sat for a number of years on the judicial panel of the British Horseracing Authority.

Catherine Ellis

Described as “conscientious, hardworking and a fabulously prepared advocate”, Catherine Ellis is ranked as a Leading Junior in Children Law in the current edition of the Legal 500 and has a wealth of experience in both public and private law family matters. She enjoys a varied practice – accepting instructions from parents, guardians and local authorities alike, which enables her to bring invaluable insight to every client’s case. Catherine is instructed in complex children act matters, such as those involving fabricated and induced illness, sexual abuse or those involving international issues. In 2012 Catherine spent a year as an in-house advocate for a London borough, representing the borough in child protection matters, as well as cases concerning education and judicial review. She also has experience of work in housing and property disputes, employment law, social welfare law and personal injury. Catherine regularly undertakes work in the Court of Protection and has particular expertise of cases concerning welfare decisions, as well as experience of cases involving jurisdictional issues. Catherine displays good judgment, is pragmatic and is committed to delivering sound advice. Her people skills are excellent, as is her ability to understand her clients’ needs and present them effectively to the court. Catherine has experience in the appeal courts, but generally prefers to achieve success at first instance. Catherine also accepts instructions under the Bar Council Public Access scheme. In 2023 Catherine was appointed a Recorder on the South Eastern Circuit and sits in Crime. Reported cases: RE B (CHILDREN) [2019] EWCA Civ 2265 (Successful defence of HHJ Simon Oliver’s welfare evaluation in care proceedings.) RE O (A CHILD) [2013] EWCA Civ 1773 (Appeal by a maternal grandmother against the making of a prohibited steps order alongside a special guardianship order preventing her return with the child to her country of residence). G v G [2006] EWCA Civ 1670 (Appeal against sentence following committal – 12 months excessive, reduced to 8. Judge had erred by failing to allow Counsel to mitigate.)

Victoria Ellis’s practice encompasses all aspects of private family law and the overlapping areas of Inheritance. She has extensive experience representing parties at all stages of non-contentious and contested hearings. Whilst her particular interests include financial remedies cases and all private law children matters, she is routinely instructed in relation to claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, and claims for financial provision under schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989. Victoria is regularly instructed in cases involving vulnerable individuals. Victoria has a reputation for combining an empathetic manner with assertive and pragmatic legal advice, this was recognised when she was shortlisted for Jordan’s Family Law – Young Barrister of the Year 2015. Victoria is listed as a ‘Leading Junior’ in Legal 500 and is available to sit as a pFDR Judge.

Rebecca Fairbairn

Rebecca only accepts instructions in the most serious cases and is routinely instructed in those in which Queens Counsel is instructed by the defence. As a Grade 4 RASSO prosecutor, Rebecca is a specialist in the most serious sexual offences, with wide experience prosecuting and defending the most grave and sensitive cases, including those involving multiple complainants and defendants. Rebecca is also a grade 4 Serious Crime panel member and has a wealth of experience in cases such as drug importation, human trafficking, murder and serious violence. She is routinely instructed in paper-heavy cases. Rebecca delivers first-class advocacy with fair and effective closing speeches.

Eleanor Fargin (Ellie) has acquired a reputation that she is rightly proud of as being fair, likeable, straight forward, having sound judgment, all whilst exceeding the standards required of her as an advocate. Ellie started her career on the Western Circuit in 2004, specialising in crime and developing a practice in prosecution and defence work. In 2007 Ellie joined the CPS as an in-house advocate and quickly secured an exclusive Crown Court practice. Ellie was fortunate to have exposure to a high case load, cases of importance and was also able to develop her trial advocacy competence. Ellie’s drive to further herself as well as her skills and experience, opened doors for her to prosecute cases of length, complexity and standing. In 2012 Ellie was appointed a Grade 3 and covered a vast amount of RASSO work. During internal and external advocacy assessments, Ellie was noted to be capable of working beyond what was expected of her at Grade 3; and in performance reviews noted as being an asset to the CPS. In 2015 Ellie’s family relocated to the Cayman Islands in the British West Indies. This brought the opportunity to work for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in this important financial jurisdiction. There was more variety in Ellie’s work there as she became responsible for all planning enforcement, environmental, and agricultural prosecutions, as well as working in inquests, and in trade and business cases. Ellie has therefore developed a sound understanding of regulatory crime. In terms of general crime, Ellie continued to specialise in sexual offences, drug trafficking, International legal assistance, and restraint and confiscation. Having returned to the Western Circuit and having joined Chambers in 2018 Ellie continues to strive for excellence as a general criminal and regulatory practitioner. Ellie is a CPS grade 4 prosecutor and is on the RASSO list, she was also appointed to the list of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law. As a Defence Advocate Ellie has demonstrated that she is respected and liked by clients as she builds rapport quickly and effectively. Ellie has the confidence of the Solicitors she has worked for as she is efficient, competent and goes the extra mile. To enhance her personal development Ellie has undertaken training to become an advocacy assessor for pupils on the Western Circuit and to become a Pupil Supervisor.

Eleanor Fargin (Ellie) has acquired a reputation that she is rightly proud of as being fair, likeable, straight forward, having sound judgment, all whilst exceeding the standards required of her as an advocate. Ellie started her career on the Western Circuit in 2004, specialising in crime and developing a practice in prosecution and defence work. In 2007 Ellie joined the CPS as an in-house advocate and quickly secured an exclusive Crown Court practice. Ellie was fortunate to have exposure to a high case load, cases of importance and was also able to develop her trial advocacy competence. Ellie’s drive to further herself as well as her skills and experience, opened doors for her to prosecute cases of length, complexity and standing. In 2012 Ellie was appointed a Grade 3 and covered a vast amount of RASSO work. During internal and external advocacy assessments, Ellie was noted to be capable of working beyond what was expected of her at Grade 3; and in performance reviews noted as being an asset to the CPS. In 2015 Ellie’s family relocated to the Cayman Islands in the British West Indies. This brought the opportunity to work for the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions in this important financial jurisdiction. There was more variety in Ellie’s work there as she became responsible for all planning enforcement, environmental, and agricultural prosecutions, as well as working in inquests, and in trade and business cases. Ellie has therefore developed a sound understanding of regulatory crime. In terms of general crime, Ellie continued to specialise in sexual offences, drug trafficking, International legal assistance, and restraint and confiscation. Having returned to the Western Circuit and having joined Chambers in 2018 Ellie continues to strive for excellence as a general criminal and regulatory practitioner. Ellie is a CPS grade 4 prosecutor and is on the RASSO list, she was also appointed to the list of Specialist Regulatory Advocates in Health and Safety and Environmental Law. As a Defence Advocate Ellie has demonstrated that she is respected and liked by clients as she builds rapport quickly and effectively. Ellie has the confidence of the Solicitors she has worked for as she is efficient, competent and goes the extra mile. To enhance her personal development Ellie has undertaken training to become an advocacy assessor for pupils on the Western Circuit and to become a Pupil Supervisor.

Antonia Ford draws from over 20 years of experience as a lawyer, both as a solicitor and as a barrister. In her successful career as a solicitor, she was Head of Fraud at Clyde & Co and a partner within the Claims Validation Team at DAC Beachcroft before transferring to the Bar. Antonia has a varied practice covering all aspects of civil litigation, with particular expertise in personal injury, credit hire and fraud. Antonia is the Head of the Personal Injury Practice Group within Chambers and has extensive experience of RTAs, highway claims, employer’s liability, occupier’s liability, travel claims, product liability and clinical negligence. She regularly appears in the County Court and Coroner’s Court and has acted in multi-track trials, fast track trials, small claims hearings, MOJ Stage 3 hearings, interlocutory applications and inquests. Antonia is also a qualified mediator. Prior to joining the Bar, she contributed to a number of industry think tanks (including the Insurance Times Fraud Charter, the ABI, the Harmone Group and the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH). She was described as a ‘class act’ in the Legal 500. She is a published author and her book ‘A Practical Guide to the Pre-Action RTA Claims Protocol for Personal Injury Lawyers’ is available on both the publishers website and from Amazon. She has also had articles published on a wide range of legal topics.

Courts Martial Criminal Regulatory & Disciplinary Transport Law Road Traffic Offences

Adam Gadd has a common law background and undertakes a wide range of civil litigation. His practice includes expertise in personal injury, business and commercial, property, building and construction and costs law. He is regularly instructed in these practice areas both in an advisory capacity and as an advocate in the civil courts and tribunals at all levels. He has appeared before a variety of courts and tribunals including The Land Registry and Property Tribunals, the High Court, Court of Appeal and Courts-Martial. Adam acts for a variety of small and medium-sized businesses and individuals as well as in high-value cases involving large multinational organisations and local authorities. He has particular expertise in personal injury fraud cases and has acted for both claimants and insurers in such cases. He regularly gives seminars and publishes articles on his areas of expertise.

Maria Gallagher

Maria Gallagher is a family law specialist, having practised in this area throughout her professional career and specialised since 2003. Her practice spans all areas of family law with a particular emphasis on children work. In public law Maria represents parents, children, local authorities and extended family members. She has expertise in cases which involve death and non-accidental injuries, serious sexual abuse and factitious illness often with complex and competing expert medical evidence. She also regularly acts in cases involving domestic abuse and neglect, parents with learning disabilities, capacity or mental health issues, concerns around substance abuse and addiction and cases involving children with complex medical / disabilities needs or special educational needs. In private law Maria is regularly instructed in residence, contact and specific issue applications. She has particular experience in cases of intractable conflict, of implacable hostility / parental alienation, cases involving domestic abuse and applications for internal and international relocation. Maria has expertise in litigation involving financial settlements following the breakdown of marriage or civil partnership from First Directions Appointment through to final hearing. She often advises in cases prior to the commencement of proceedings in order to assist in facilitating the earliest resolution for her client.

Justin Gau has particular expertise in Regulatory work, sitting as a legal Assessor for the General Dental Council, General Chiropractic Council and Nursing & Midwifery Council. Justin is also specialist in the area of Ecclesiastical law, appearing regularly in Consistory Courts, Clergy Discipline Tribunals and advising Clergy, PCC’s and others. He has experience in Employment law he has developed a specialism in advising Medical professionals, the clergy and others on actions for unfair dismissal and discrimination actions. He is a priest in the Diocese of London, Chancellor of the Diocese of Bristol, Chancellor of the Diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich, Deputy Chancellor of the Diocese of Lincoln and Deputy Chancellor of the Diocese of Bath and Wells. He is an Honorary Canon of the Cathedral of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich. With wide experience in Criminal work he has had particular expertise in dealing with commercial fraud, white collar crime, money laundering and serious sex offences and as a result has experience in the management of high volume cases.

Daniela Gilbert

Daniella Gilbert is an experienced practitioner specialising in employment law and commercial litigation. She acts for both claimants and defendants / respondents. Her clients range from individuals, employees, sole traders and small businesses to large employers and Fortune 500 companies. Daniella’s precision and attention to detail has garnered her a reputation as an advocate well able to undertake particularly complex and high value cases. She appears in courts at many levels including the Court of Appeal, High Court, Employment Appeal Tribunal, Employment Tribunal and County Courts. Clients value her thorough preparation, ability to quickly grasp the complexities of a case and provide detailed and clear advice, and her commitment to robustly representing her client’s position. Daniella is qualified to accept instructions via the Public Access Scheme.

"Andrew is a calm but strong and incisive advocate with great attention to detail. He has a perfect combination of tenacity and authority. He has exceptional communication skills with all types of clients." Legal 500, 2023 Previous Next Andrew Grime is a highly experienced specialist practitioner in family and civil law, with a particular emphasis on disputes where the two areas overlap. His financial work encompasses matrimonial finance, Schedule 1, international issues and complex substantial asset cases. Andrew’s practice involves all aspects of care and adoption proceedings, including complex and serious injury cases. He acts for parents, children and local authorities as well as public bodies, victims and perpetrators of sexual and physical abuse and CAFCASS. His children work includes disputes in respect of living and care arrangements, international relocation, complex disputes involving allegations of harm, mental health issues and parental alienation. He advises and represents clients in a wide range of probate claims and property disputes with a particular emphasis on claims pursuant to the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. He is an accredited mediator in civil and family finance cases. Andrew lectures regularly for CLT on trust issues in respect of cohabitation disputes. He also lectures to solicitors throughout England and Wales in respect of Children Act 1989 Schedule 1 applications, ancillary relief, Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 and probate.

Naomi Gyane has established a strong specialist Employment law practice often representing in politically-sensitive, public-interest, high-value and complex employment-related disputes. Her expertise is especially honed in the area of whistleblowing and discrimination claims. This is due to her sound command of the complex legal tests involved and her ability to draw out the relevance of often dense factual matrices to support the case or defence being advanced. Naomi represents both Respondents and Claimants which gives her the benefit of being able to advise dynamically, objectively, anecdotally and ultimately to anticipate the counter arguments, merits and weaknesses in a case at Final Hearing. She is regularly instructed by international Companies, Multi-national Corporations, Local Authorities, Police Forces and SMEs. She has also represented individuals whether classed as workers or employees and from entry level employment up to C-suite. We receive instructions for Naomi on all aspects of employment law issues and litigation including, internal HR matters, independent investigations, advising on merits of claims and defences, drafting Tribunal pleadings and representation at Tribunal hearings, interim injunctions/relief and Mediations. In addition to her employment practice, Naomi also specialises in Ecclesiastical law matters. This includes being appointed to sit as Panel Chair in the Clergy Disciplinary Tribunal and her appointments as Chancellor of the Diocese of Leicester and Deputy Chancellor of the Diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich.

Richard Hall practises exclusively in the area of Financial Remedies. His cases generally comprise medium to high value assets involving businesses, complex income structures and pensions. He also undertakes a significant number of farming cases. He is highly regarded for his extensive preparation and mastery of the detail and figures in complex cases. Richard is also regularly instructed as a private FDR evaluator, bringing together his extensive experience in this field and his ability to understand and build the trust of individuals from a wide variety of backgrounds Richard regularly writes and delivers seminars, both in-house and externally on many aspects of Financial Remedy Practice and Procedure.

Caroline Hartley

Caroline Hartley specialises in representing parents, especially if they are vulnerable due to mental health problems, addictions or learning difficulties. She is also very experienced in representing children and local authorities. She has been instructed in many cases involving non-accidental injury (including the most serious cases in which a child has died, or has suffered permanent and significant injury). Caroline is also experienced in factitious or induced illness cases, salt poisoning and sexual abuse as well as neglect, physical and emotional abuse. Clients consider Caroline to be empathic, sensitive, considerate and kind. She is also described as articulate, learned, experienced and flexible; Her abilities include being pragmatic and invariably quick to focus upon the most pertinent points. “Skilful and professional are terms used to describe her by judges”. Caroline was previously qualified as a solicitor. In this capacity she worked for five years both in private practice and for Hampshire County Council, first in civil litigation before specialising in children. Caroline regularly appears in the Family Proceedings Court, County Court, High Court and the Court of Appeal. She also sits as Deputy District Judge in both public and private law children and in civil matters. Since 2011, she has been a legal assessor for the General Medical Council and since 2013 a legal assessor for the Nursing Midwifery Council. She was appointed as a Deputy District Judge on the Western Circuit in February 2013.

Kevin Haven has a civil practice centred around clinical negligence and personal injury work. He was formerly with a leading clinical negligence and personal injury Chambers. Kevin has over 35 years experience dealing with clinical negligence and personal injury claims, predominantly acting for Claimants but increasingly instructed on behalf of Defendants. He is recommended as a leading junior in the Legal 500 for clinical negligence and personal injury claims. He is cited for his significant experience in all types of injury litigation, as an excellent tactician in presenting complex injury matters, recognised for his numeracy skills and his ability to explain issues to clients in plain English.

Henry Hawkesworth

Henry Hawkesworth joined Pump Court Chambers in December 2018. He is a civil practitioner with a practice chiefly encompassing: personal injury, including clinical negligence; trusts of land disputes, (mainly under TLATA 1996) and proprietary estoppel; residential and commercial landlord and tenant; real property; and general commercial litigation. Henry also maintains a parallel practice in family law, focussing on: private disputes relating to children under the Children Act 1989; and applications for non-molestation and occupation orders under the Family Law Act 1996. Henry is highly regarded by his solicitors and clients for his thorough preparation, clear advice, and straightforward manner. Before coming to the bar, Henry read Music at King’s College, Cambridge, where he sang as a choral scholar. He won the Bertram Faulkner Prize twice consecutively, and the Harmer Prize in his final year.

Maria Henty is building a practice in all areas of family law, with a particular interest in family finance. Maria read social and political sciences at Girton College, Cambridge, before converting to law. Prior to coming to the bar, Maria worked for two years as a solicitor’s agent, attending the County Court on a daily basis on a variety of civil matters. She is a founding donor and assisting barrister for the legal charity Not Beyond Redemption, assisting mothers in prison or recently released from prison with re-establishing and regenerating the fundamental relationship between mother and child. Maria accepts instructions to act as an evaluator in private FDRs. Maria can also assist as an evaluator for pDRAs. Maria is direct access qualified. In January 2024, Maria was reported in the following judgment: K v Y [2023] EWFC 262 (B) following complex private children proceedings. Maria was praised in the judgment for the clear and careful way in which she put her client’s case. In October 2024, following an appeal in the High Court in August 2024 Maria was reported in the case of Re: V (Appeal: Relocation) [2024] EWHC 2600 (Fam). In this matter Maria successfully represented the respondent mother on appeal. The matter concerned internal relocation by the mother to a Northern city.

Andrew Houston is a specialist criminal barrister. Andrew has successfully defended and prosecuted cases of serious violence, fraud, drug and sexual offences.

Penny Howe KC acts in all aspects of the law relating to children. In public law Penny represents local authorities, parents, guardians and competent children. She has particular expertise in cases which involve death and non-accidental injuries, allegations of serious sexual abuse, factitious and induced illness, child trafficking and cross examination of expert and vulnerable witnesses. In private law Penny acts in disputes between parents and other significant adults including cases involving serious harm, and internal and international relocation. Penny also has considerable experience in proceedings relating to press injunctions arising out of public law proceedings. Penny was a member of the RCVS’ Preliminary Investigation Committee from 2013 to 2018. From 2014 to 2017 (and the employment of case examiners) Penny was a lay Chair of the GDC’s Investigating Committee. From 2016-2017, Penny was a Deputy Chair of the GOC’s Investigating Committee. Since 2015, Penny has been a lay member of the GOC’s Fitness to Practise Committee. Penny has been a legal assessor for the NMC since 2016, and was recently appointed a legal assessor for the HCPC.

Naznin specialises in public and private children law proceedings. She has particular expertise in cases involving international elements, including child abduction, forced marriage and relocation. Naznin also deals with complex matters involving domestic violence and sexual abuse, mental health and non-accidental injuries. Prior to joining chambers in 2005, Naznin practiced from Tooks Court (Chambers of Michael Mansfied QC); headed an immigration department in a CAB; was Legal Advisor to AVID; and worked with the UNHCR in a consultancy role. Naznin further honed her human rights experience at the ECHR where she was employed as a lawyer at the invitation of the court. Naznin’s considerable experience in immigration, crime and human rights often assists her in effectively dealing with issues arising from children law matters. She has represented local authorities, parents, children, other relatives and intervenors as well as sports and media personalities. Naznin regularly appears before all levels of court, including the High Court and Court of Appeal.

Corinne Iten specialises in Children Law. She has a special interest in public law and is regularly instructed on behalf of local authorities, parents and children. She frequently deals with complex cases, both public and private, including those where there are allegations of domestic abuse, non-accidental injury, parental alienation, factitious induced illness or sexual abuse, and cases with an international element.

Specialist practitioner in property law. Some recent significant cases: Lankester & Son Ltd v Rennie [2014] EWCA Civ 1515: This case concerned a valuable commercial lease. Acted for Lankester & Son Ltd at first instance and a Court of Appeal. Successfully established in both courts that the tenant could not escape liability under the lease even though he had transferred the premises to another occupant. Innerspaces Self Storage Ltd v Harding & others [2014] EWCA Civ 46: Represented Harding and others at first instance and at Court of Appeal. Successfully established in both courts that the client landlord was not liable to his tenant, on any basis, for depositing a large quantity of hardcore on the business park on which the tenant’s property was located. Wise v Jimenez [2014] WTLR 163 Ch D: This was a high-profile and bitterly contested case. It involved difficult issues of fact and law and required meticulous case management at a lengthy trial. Stephen successfully recovered equitable compensation of £500,000 for his client, Mr Wise – a well-known former professional footballer. Application of Stafford-Flowers [2014] UKUT 0082 (LC): The applicant applied to the Upper Tribunal to discharge a covenant which prevented him from living all year round in a holiday chalet on the Isle of Wight. In a difficult and hard-fought case, Stephen successfully resisted the application on behalf of the objectors.

Sarah made her mark in prosecuting and defending in cases involving multiple allegations of historic sexual abuse and other serious sexual allegations. Having taken silk, she now undertakes the most serious and complex of cases and is routinely instructed by both prosecution and defence in cases of fatal violence, complex child cruelty and neglect, serious sexual violence and fraud. She accepts publicly and privately funded work and can in suitable cases be instructed on a direct access basis. She is expert in the questioning or representation of those considered vulnerable either by reason of their extreme youth or age, capabilities, health or the nature of the offences with which the case is concerned. She is often instructed for challenging clients – those requiring careful handling due to psychiatric or other reasons. She has an approachable manner but can be firm or authoritative as required.

David Josty is a specialist family law practitioner with expertise in children law (public and private), family finance and Court of Protection. He has a particularly busy practice in the area of children law (public). Expanding on the breadth and depth of experience that he has acquired through his Children Law practice, David has developed an interest in Court of Protection work. Notably acting on a pro bono basis, David recently successfully represented the Appellant father in the matter of Re Y (Children in Care: Change of Nationality) [2020] EWCA Civ 1038 (see below). David has also developed an interest in the Court of Protection. David has acted in a broad range of public law cases on behalf of Local Authorities, lay parties (including parents, other relatives / intervenors) and children. Cases with which David has had considerable experience include those involving allegations of physical and sexual abuse, non-accidental injury, domestic violence, murder, neglect and substance misuse. David has a significant portfolio of cases in which he has acted for vulnerable parties with learning disabilities and / or mental health problems and also where the subject children share such presentation. David’s experience extends to cases involving the Official Solicitor. Selected cases: Wiltshire Council v M & Anor (gonorhheal infection in a child) [2021] EWFC B31 Re Y (Children in Care: Change of Nationality) [2020] EWCA Civ 1038 Kent County Council v A,B,C and D (Children : Weight to be attached to evidence of child after flawed ABE interviews) (Rev 1) [2017] EWFC B72 (01 March 2017) SM & Ors (Welfare) [2016] EWFC 15 (22 March 2016) Wiltshire Council v R & Ors [2014] EWFC B76 (30 April 2014) David is regularly instructed in complex children law matters involving child arrangement disputes, relocation cases (both internal and international) and change of name. He has experience of representing parties in proceedings involving parental alienation and where there are allegations of serious physical, emotional and/or sexual abuse. He has considerable experience in finding of fact hearings and his practice in private law work has led to an increasing number of appearances in the High Court. David has developed a practice around his interest in applications under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989 and TOLATA. David also receives instruction in matrimonial finance matters. His experience in this area extends to cases involving businesses, foreign assets, pensions and intervening third party interests.

Geoffrey Kelly is specialist in the field of family finance, with many years of experience under his belt. Geoffrey’s reputation is founded on many years of experience in resolving family finance issues. In particular he deals with financial remedies upon divorce or dissolution of civil partnerships, applications under Schedule 1 of the Children Act 1989, property disputes between cohabitees and disputes regarding children. Geoffrey regularly appears in the Principal Registry of the Family Division and local County Courts. The following are examples of recent cases in which he has been involved: A v A – represented the wife of an internationally renowned composer in financial proceedings in the CFC. The husband is represented by Howard Kennedy. B v B – represented an eminent planning silk in both financial and children proceedings. The wife was represented by Charles Russell. C v C – represented the husband who had recently sold his stake in a software firm for a substantial sum and who planned to retire. D v D – represented the husband on a capitalisation/variation application where his considerable fortune arose from shares obtained during the course of the marriage and which were retained by him following the original consent order in the financial proceedings. E v E – represented the husband in financial proceedings where the wealth accrued as a result of the joint efforts of the parties who were the joint owners of a financial advice business. His opponent was a silk. F v F – represented an asset-rich dairy farmer in financial proceedings where the main issue was how to extract cash from illiquid assets. G v G – representing the wife in a case where the husband is seeking to reopen financial remedy proceedings years after they were concluded on the grounds that he is now facing bankruptcy. The Husband is represented by a silk. H v H – representing the husband who is one of many beneficiaries in a significant trust established in an EU country. Reported cases Bhura v Bhura [2015] 1 FLR 153; In Re B (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 1001; Fytche v Wincanton Logistics plc [2004] UKHL 31, [2004] ICR 975; I v N [2003] EWHC 327; A etc v Times Newspapers [2002] EWHC 2444, [2003] 1 FLR 689; R v Headley [1996] TRT 173.

Simon Lane is a property and estates barrister and mediator, with a niche practice in the law of town and village greens. Simon’s practice in both property and inheritance matters means he is particularly well placed to help clients at risk of losing their home, farm or other business after a death. Simon is particularly sensitive to the legal issues that crop up in claims that arise on death and prides himself on being able to deal with the often delicate relationships between family members. Simon is based in London with a national practice concentrated across London, the South and West of England.

Jennifer is a specialist family law practitioner. She has a thriving practice in family finance, and has successfully represented high-net-worth clients in complex cases involving inherited wealth, family businesses, significant pensions, trusts, and nuptial agreements. Many of her cases involve tax complications, foreign assets and cross-jurisdictional issues, and the validity or otherwise of an overseas marriage/ divorce (including those relating to jurisdictions in Asia and Africa). Jennifer has appeared in high-profile reported cases, notably in Veluppillai v Veluppillai & Ors [2015] EWHC 3095 (Fam) (High Court), in LFL v LSL (McKenzie Friends & Breach of Court Orders) [2017] EWFC B62, and in N v N (Afghanistan: Validity of an overseas marriage: Procedure)[2020] EWFC B55. Jennifer also has an interest in Court of Protection matters, particularly where there are overlaps with divorce/financial remedies, and retains a niche practice in surrogacy/modern families, having acted for commissioning parents in the UK and abroad in HFEA cases. Jennifer is regularly instructed in arbitrations, private FDRs and mediations. She sits as a private FDR judge. She has been consistently top-ranked in the directories as a leading junior in her field, and has been highly commended for her attention to detail and her robust approach. She is also experienced in Schedule 1 (financial provision for children), cohabitation, and trusts of land disputes.

Ezra Macdonald is an employment specialist, with substantial complementary experience of commercial and property law. His advocacy experience is extensive, including appearances before the Employment Tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the County Court, the High Court, the First-Tier Tribunal (War Pension and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber, Social Entitlement Chamber, Criminal Injuries Compensation Chamber; and Property Chamber); the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber, Immigration and Asylum Chamber, and Tax & Chancery Chamber); the Magistrates’ Courts, the Crown Court, and the Coroner’s Court. He is frequently instructed on behalf of both claimants and defendants in civil proceedings; on behalf of union- and privately-funded claimants in the Employment Tribunals; and by large respondent organisations, including the third sector. Ezra is Public Access (‘Direct Access’) qualified, and is available to accept instructions directly on matters relating to employment, property, or general civil law. Before coming to the Bar, Ezra studied Philosophy at the Universities of Cambridge, Bristol, and St Andrews, where he completed a PhD on the foundations of ethics and was employed as tutor and examiner. Ezra sits as a Fee-paid Employment Judge assigned to the Wales region, and is an advocacy trainer for both The Honourable Society of Gray’s Inn and the Western Circuit.

Stuart is a highly regarded barrister with a wealth of experience in cases concerning finances when parties separate, whether in a divorce, civil partnership or co-habitation breakdown, and regularly represents both the main parties and intervenors who seek to protect their interests in such disputes, whether on behalf of Trustees or family members who had provided financial support that was not intended to be shared on divorce between the couple. Stuart applies a forensic manner to the numbers and takes a sledgehammer to cross examination; having unearthed hidden assets, exposed blatant lies and revealed the true colours of a witness, all in recent cases where more than a robust approach was required. Stuart’s case preparation is appreciated by clients who value an inclusive approach to ensure their case is properly heard and understood by the Court; his experienced battles on points of law and ability to interpret and apply past cases and legislation has been noted by Judges at the highest levels, including the High Court and Court of Appeal. Stuart is often instructed where cross-jurisdictional issues and foreign assets are involved, having been successful in recent times in the Court of Appeal in a matter involving Italian parties, such being regarded a case of such significance, it was live-streamed, and he gladly provides the link to anyone who may require it, and even to those who have no interest! Cases involving pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements, and cohabitation agreements are among the matters Stuart has been involved with, where such are considered as a preliminary issue in Court, or as part of the main hearing, and, even when initially being drafted, Stuart is able to advise as to risk and prospects of being upheld and assist with strategy planning to seek to achieve the best outcome for his clients. Outside of Court, Stuart has a host of interests and endeavours, some more successful than others, although now having improved his photographic competency beyond the famed “demon-baby”. Examples of Stuart’s cases include: A v A [2023] EWFC 200 Housing Needs & Schedule I where other litigation between the parties impacted the resources. Manetta v De Filippo [2022] EWCA Civ 409 Jurisdiction in divorce proceedings – Italy v UK & the issue of lis pendens Stacey v McNicholas [2022] EWHC 278 (Fam) Schedule I – Lump sums used as regular monthly payments for rent & Trusts F v F [2025] Finances on divorce – assets in USA and s.37 relief where assets had been disposed of mid-proceedings. ND v GD (Litigation Friend) [2021] EWFC 53 Divorce case concerning inherited wealth at the end of the relationship & a party who had developed a life limiting condition that increased needs beyond the matrimonial resources.

Julie Mackenzie is a highly experienced and skilled family practitioner. She specialises public and private law cases, acting for parents, children and local authorities which ensures that she is able to bring insight to all clients. Julie has over 40 years experience in the Family Courts, during which time she has practised in all areas of family law. She brings considerable expertise and resources to the demanding and challenging world of the Family Court. This experience is supported by an interest in mediation and the benefits this brings to the family courts. Although based in London and a Western Circuiteer she has appeared in many court centres within the jurisdiction of England and Wales. Julie is also an experienced mediator who mediates in family, equestrian and civil cases. Areas of law include: Alternative Dispute Resolution Civil Mediation Inheritance Mediation Child Abduction Children Law (Private) Children Law (Public) Direct Access Equestrian Law Family Finance

Paul Mertens has a busy practice, encompassing civil, family, and public law. Paul has successfully represented parties in a wide range of courts and tribunals, including claims in the King’s Bench, Chancery, and Family Divisions of the High Court and in the Court of Appeal. Paul’s background in company secretarial and in-house legal work has given him a strong commercial insight, and he prides himself on providing pragmatic commercial advice to his clients. Before joining chambers, Paul worked at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), and he maintains an interest in and advises on professional disciplinary complaints and data protection. He is Pump Court Chambers’ Data Protection Officer and has provided training on the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Data Protection Act 2018 to a range of organisations, including government departments and public inquiries / statutory reviews. Since joining the Bar, Paul has been instructed in a number of cases by the Government Legal Department. In 2018, he was appointed to the Attorney General’s Panel of Special Advocates. In 2020, he was appointed to the Attorney-General’s London B Panel, and in 2025, he was promoted to the London A Panel of Counsel to the Crown.

Lucy is a specialist criminal barrister. She undertakes all areas of criminal work, both prosecuting and defending. Lucy has appeared in the Court of Appeal (CMAC), Crown Courts, Magistrates’ Courts and Youth Courts. She has a busy criminal practice, and is instructed in the full range of offences (sexual offences, offences of violence, traffic offences, drugs, and dishonesty). She is regularly instructed in the Courts Martial. Lucy is analytical, persuasive, and robust. She combines this with an empathetic, down-to-Earth approach which puts lay clients at ease.

Jason Nickless is experienced in commercial and civil litigation. He can be relied upon to provide carefully considered advice and robust representation in contentious disputes. Before being called to the Bar in 2001, Jason Nickless worked as an academic at the University of Leuven and later as the managing director of his own consultancy company. He has published numerous books and articles on the subject of European Social Law. He was particularly involved in considering the impact of the EC provisions on competition and free movement upon social systems such as health care and pensions. He has given presentations at conferences and lectures at universities throughout Central and Western Europe including Barcelona, Brno, Brussels, Bucharest, Budapest, Genève, Graz, Helsinki, Kiev, Ljubljana, Luxembourg, Maastricht, Mangalia, Moscow, Ostend, Prague, Sarajevo, Strasbourg and Tallinn. He has undertaken consultancy work for the Council of Europe in Strasbourg and the European Commission in Brussels as well as government ministries and NGO’s.

Regarded as a leading practitioner in the UK and Nigeria, Oba Nsugbe QC, SAN has a broad international practice focussing on Africa related litigation and dispute resolution. He provides high-level advice and representation for individuals, corporate clients and other organisations, (including NGOs), in matters ranging from business crime and corrupt practices to contractual and corporate disputes. His ongoing international work includes advising the Swiss Government in its case against Nigeria before ITLOS, acting as joint lead Counsel for two US companies in only Nigeria’s second case at ICSID, and Counsel in a multi-jurisdictional claim for families of multiple victims of the Dana Air Crash in Lagos in 2012. He advised and appeared for the Lagos State Government in arbitral proceedings instituted against it following the collapse of Enron and the termination of various related contracts entered into by the State. Oba has also provided expert advice and evidence on issues of Nigerian law to a wide range of institutional, corporate and individual clients ranging from the Treasury Solicitors to leading City firms and business entrepreneurs. Called to the Bar in 1985, when Oba took silk in 2002 aged only 39, he was described in a leading law commentary as “a rising star of the Bar of England and Wales”. He commands considerable respect from both clients and peers. Numerous entries in Chambers and Partners over the years have described him as “a first-class advocate” as well as “a true gentleman who deserves his fabulous reputation”, adding that he has a “fine forensic mind” and is admired for his “technical excellence”. Contributors to the directory have also remarked that he is “fabulously personable, easy-going, and adored by judges and juries”, “works extremely well in a team” and “impresses interviewees with his calm and genial manner”. Oba was recognised as one of Africa’s top 20 arbitrators in Africa’s Arbitration Powerlist Awards, administered by the Africa Arbitration Academy.

Stephanie Painter

Stephanie Painter has a mixed common law practice, accepting instructions across a range of criminal, regulatory and public law matters, with a focus on crime. Regularly instructed to defend and prosecute in the Crown Court, Stephanie’s practice encompasses a range of offences including serious violence, sexual assault and drugs. Stephanie is a qualified Grade 3 CPS Panel Advocate and prosecutes and defends Magistrates and Crown Court trials. Having completed a six-month secondment with the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Offences Unit, she has gained considerable experience and insight into cases of this nature and has since defended and prosecuted rape and serious sexual offences. Stephanie is on the CPS RASSO Panel. Stephanie is ranked as a Rising Star for Crime (General and Fraud) in the Legal 500 2026. Stephanie previously assisted on the Covid-19 Inquiry as Junior Counsel, having supported the Undercover Policing Inquiry and the Horizon Post Office Inquiry. Stephanie is currently working on the Afghanistan Inquiry, instructed by the Ministry of Defence as Counsel for the Witness Legal Team. Stephanie is ranked as a Leading Junior for Inquests and Inquiries in the Legal 500 2026. In 2025, Stephanie was appointed to the Attorney General’s Regional C Panel of Junior Counsel for a period of 5 years. Prior to coming to the Bar, Stephanie worked as a Project Manager for a global e-disclosure company. Stephanie managed numerous international projects with magic-circle law firms and advised clients on the e-discovery process from start to finish. Stephanie has also previously worked as a Legal Assistant for a regional solicitors firm, so has a working knowledge of case management.

Charles Parry is an experienced common law advocate, employment, criminal, administrative and appeal practitioner, specialising in associated areas of civil work, regulatory crime, and inquests. He regularly appears in employment tribunals in a range of cases. He has been in full time private practice at the Bar continuously since 1974. His practice can be described as common law, but with emphasis on regulatory breaches with the consequential criminal liability. He is also an approved counsel on the Attorney-General’s list, grade A, and regularly instructed by a number of government departments, including HM Revenue and Customs, the Health and Safety Executive, Department of Work and Pensions, together with the Crown Prosecution Service. He conducts related work in the civil courts, inquests, and disciplinary hearings (police, and financial regulation). Charles is happy to advise at an early stage of a dispute to promote resolution and/or assist in case preparation. He is particularly interested in the psychological effect of litigation on vulnerable witnesses and the way a shift of emphasis in the presentation of the evidence may affect the outcome.

Nigel Pascoe KC

Nigel Pascoe KC is a specialist in public and private enquiry work, criminal and regulatory law and jury advocacy. He also undertakes Courts Martial. He is the senior member of Chambers and has been one of the top jury advocates in the country since taking Silk in 1988. He has appeared in over 130 murder cases. These include many high profile cases on the Western Circuit, since taking silk in 1988. He is particularly well known for his jury speeches. He has considerable experience of mental health issues, notably in murder cases. He was a President of the Mental Health Review Tribunal for over 12 years, dealing with more serious restricted cases. He believes strongly in close teamwork in major cases and a good working professional relationship with professional and. lay clients. He is IT literate, with a particular interest in all aspects of Court technology. Specifically he in a position to appear as an advocate and to advise online, both inside and outside the jurisdiction. Nigel Pascoe KC ONLINE representation – All representation is through Pump Court Chambers Temple EC4Y 7AJ Tel No: London (020) 7353 0711. Winchester 01962 868161. Nigel Pascoe KC may be instructed now to appear online as an advocate in England and Wales and other jurisdictions where overseas representation is permitted. Specifically, where online representation is accepted by the trial Judge, he may be instructed in Serious Pleas in Mitigation Appeals against Sentence Inquests Public Inquiries Miscellaneous, preliminary or other proceedings. This development has been made possible by the huge growth in online work, both in and outside the jurisdiction. Nigel Pascoe KC also lectures, performs and coaches online on Advocacy, Cross Examination, Diminished Responsibility and the role of a Legal Assessor in regulatory proceedings. He also performs online his plays, a) The Trial of Penn and Mead, Old Bailey, 1670; b) Merely Players – about Shakespeare and Advocacy and c) Sweet Reason – about Norman Birkett KC. For all details, contact [email protected].

Oliver is an experienced and highly regard family practitioner who has specialised in financial remedies and private law children cases for over 20 years. He has earned a reputation for detailed preparation, effective advocacy, robust but sensible negotiation and practical, realistic advice. Oliver can be instructed under the Direct Public Access Scheme. Family Finance Oliver receives instructions in medium to big money cases. He has extensive experience of cases involving: Businesses Farms Trusts Inherited and other non-matrimonial assets Pre-nuptial agreements Undisclosed and dissipated assets Pensions Applications under Schedule of the Children Act 1989 Applications under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1989 Oliver appears in courts at all levels and in arbitrations. He can advise on and draft pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements. Children Law Oliver specialises in high conflict disputes relating to children. He has considerable experience of cases involving: Alienation Applications for leave to remove children from the jurisdiction Domestic violence Abuse Drug and alcohol abuse Rule 16.4 Guardians Selected Cases Re S (A Child) [2010] EWCA Civ 219 Re S (A Child) [2010] EWCA Civ 325 Re S (Transfer of Residence) [2010] 1 FLR 1785 Warwickshire County Council v TE v SH v S (A Child) [2010] EWHC B19 Warwickshire County Council v TE v SH v S (A Child) [2010] EWHC B2 C v C Six day High Court hearing before Mostyn J. representing Isle of Man trust settled by high profile, very high net worth individual, where the wife was alleging that the trust was a sham. T v T: Representing wife of high profile T v T Representing wife of high profile politician. M v M Case involving a pre-nuptial agreement signed in South Africa.

During over a decade at the Bar, Heather has built an impressive reputation in employment law, discrimination law and commercial law. Heather represents a wide cross-section of businesses, from multinational corporations to SMEs, as well as public bodies and individuals. She has handled numerous cases before the employment tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal, the High Court and the Court of Appeal; Heather is particularly in-demand for her expertise in disability, sex and race discrimination, sexual orientation, unfair dismissal, redundancy, stress at work, bullying and harassment, whistleblowing and TUPE. She has acted in several high-value cases for and against large organisations and public bodies, including primary care trusts, schools and colleges, local authorities, housing associations, police forces and major airlines. She has acted in high-value post-termination disputes involving restrictive covenants and injunctive relief and also undertakes professional regulatory work. Her cases of interest are: Merlin Financial Consultants Ltd v Cooper (2014): action to enforce restrictive covenants in the High Court against a dyslexic IFA; Okee v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2014] All ER (D) 07 (Mar); Oni v NHS Leicester City (formerly Leicester City Primary Care Trust) (Practice and Procedure: Costs) [2012] UKEAT 0144_12_1209: appearance of bias and costs in the employment tribunal; Warner v Armfield Retail & Leisure Ltd (2012) UKEAT/0376/12/SM: concerns a disabled employee and whether the doctrine of frustration can apply when the Equality Act 2010 is engaged; Richards v Tavistock and Summerhill School & Anor (2013): involves the argument that no redundancy payments should be made given the alternative offers of employment which were made after the notice period had expired or the day before its expiry.

Julian Reed practices in the areas of family and civil law, specialising in areas where the two disciplines overlap. Specialist Areas: Court of Protection Family Finance Trusts of Land Inheritance, Wills & Probate

Zoe has over 20 years of experience at the bar and is a specialist in family law, undertaking all aspects of Family Finance and Private Children work, including associated injunctions and in matters concerning an appeal. She provides practical advice, including consideration of case-appropriate alternate dispute resolution options, including mediation, arbitration and therapeutic interventions. Zoe is pragmatic and seeks to find workable solutions as early as possible in proceedings. Zoe regularly appears in courts throughout the south of England at all levels, and often provides advice as to the courts’ anticipated approach at an early stage. Zoe is robust yet calm, compassionate and has a sensible practical approach that clients, both professional and outside of the law, often find refreshing and much needed when it comes to dealing with the Court process. Zoe undertakes cases at all stages of proceedings and to ensure careful case management and that appropriate experts are involved, it is recommended that in complex or high conflict cases, she is involved as early as possible. Zoe is also instructed to provide preliminary advice prior to proceedings being issued. Zoe’s practice span often leads to her being instructed in cases involving clients involved in concurrent disputes regarding their children, injunctions and the family finances. Zoe is able to provide advice to ensure that decisions in all proceedings are considered holistically. Zoe additionally accepts Direct Access instruction from members of the public in appropriate circumstances.

Mark Ruffell is a very experienced leading junior. His expertise covers three main areas: regulatory and disciplinary work; fraud and complex crime; and ecclesiastical law. Mark Ruffell is head of the Regulatory & Disciplinary team. Mark’s broad regulatory expertise includes cases involving care homes brought by the CQC before the Care Standards Tribunal and the Magistrates’ Court, cases of director disqualification, planning enforcement, breaches of environmental legislation, licensing appeals and public inquiries before Traffic Commissioners. Mark’s broad disciplinary expertise includes appearing before major regulators of professional discipline and conduct, including the Bar Standards Tribunal, the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal and appeals to the High Court. He is a legal adviser to the General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC), the Institute of Chartered Accountants for England and Wales (ICAEW), the Nursing & Midwifery Council (NMC), the General Chiropractic Council (GCC) and the Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CiLEX). He is a legally qualified chair of the Taxation and Disciplinary Board. He is regularly instructed in heavy weight criminal defence work and is also regularly instructed by the CPS as a grade 4 advocate. He has been instructed as Independent Counsel by the Serious Fraud Office and by HMRC. Mark is Chancellor of the Diocese of Gloucester and Deputy Chancellor of the Diocese of Winchester. Mark is an occasional panel member of the Clergy Disciplinary Tribunal. He is instructed to represent Petitioners and Parties Opponent in Ecclesiastical Law cases and represents clergy in disciplinary cases. Mark is able to accept Direct Access work.

Timothy Salisbury undertakes a wide range of civil work, specialising in Public Inquiries, Commercial Disputes, Personal Injury, and Aviation. He is able to provide advisory, drafting, and advocacy expertise at all stages of the litigation process. Timothy also has experience of ADR, including mediation. Having acted in some of the most high-profile public inquiries of the last few years, Timothy is currently instructed as Deputy First Junior Counsel to the Undercover Policing Inquiry and also for the Welsh Government in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry.

Leslie Samuels KC

Leslie Samuels KC is an exceptional advocate and is held in high esteem for his expertise in children work both in public and private law cases, in financial remedies cases and in inheritance and probate disputes. He has over 30 years of experience as a barrister and took Silk in 2011. In 2012 he was appointed as a Family Recorder on the South Eastern Circuit. In 2016 he was appointed as a Deputy High Court Judge sitting as a s.9(1) Judge of the Family Division at the Royal Courts of Justice and across the country. In 2023 he was appointed as a s.9(4) Deputy High Court Judge. He is an ADR qualified mediator and an IFLA trained arbitrator. He conducts private FDR hearings. Leslie was elected as Vice-Chair of the Family Law Bar Association for 2 years from January 2024. In January 2026 he will become Chair of the Association for a further 2 years. Within Chambers he is Head of Family and Civil. Children public law: Leslie undertakes complex and high-profile public law children cases for parents, local authorities and children’s guardians both at fact-finding and at welfare hearings. He also represents parties at appellate level in the High Court, Court of Appeal and in the Supreme Court. Recent cases include: alleged murder of a child; serious non-accidental head injuries to a child including widespread brain damage; multiple fractures including skull, rib and limb fractures; alleged sexual abuse of children; alleged fictitious or induced illness; serious neglect, drug and alcohol issues; complex immigration issues; cases where local authorities have failed to perform their statutory duties to support families. Financial remedies: he has a substantial financial remedies practice at all levels of court including cases before district judges, High Court judges and the Court of Appeal. Recent cases include: ‘big money’ cases where the assets values have exceeded £10m; cases where there are substantial business assets requiring an analysis of company accounts and expert valuation evidence; cases where the assets include substantial farm land or other inherited wealth; cases where one or both parties have significant trust assets; cases where there are high-value pensions on one or both sides; situations where urgent applications are required including freezing injunctions and search (Anton Pillar) orders. Children private law: he represents parents and sometimes children in a range of private law disputes including residence, contact, removal from the jurisdiction, other specific issue applications and child abduction cases. Recent cases include: cases involving residence and contact disputes including issues over shared or joint residence and parenting; specific issue applications, including disputes over schooling and medical care; allegations of sexual abuse by a parent; applications to remove children from the jurisdiction; child abduction cases.

Criminal law, including appeals, wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice. Matthew accepts instructions by direct access, not just in purely criminal matters, but also in related areas of the law such as applications to amend or revoke Sexual Offender Prevention Orders etc. As "barristerblogger" he is one of the country's best known legal bloggers and runs the website www.barristerblogger.com. Matthew is a member of the Criminal Bar Association and the Criminal Appeal Lawyers Association.

Neelo Shravat is an experienced child law barrister. He specialises in acting for parents, children and local authorities in public law proceedings including matters before the High Court and Court of Appeal. He has significant experience in handling a wide range of cases, including those involving allegations of sexual abuse, inflicted injury, fabricated illness, and cases with significant international elements. Neelo has a particular expertise in acting for vulnerable parents including parents with learning disabilities or serious mental health issues, and those who require the enagement of the Official Solicitor. He also undertakes complex private law cases that may involve allegations of domestic abuse, sexual abuse, ‘intractable’ contact cases, changes of residence, and applications for leave to remove from the jurisdiction. Neelo brings a broad breadth of experience to his courtroom advocacy having started his career with a busy criminal and common law practice before focussing on family law for the past 10 years. He remains resolutely committed to publicly funded work and considers it the heart of his practice.

Leonorah Smith is a family practitioner, who specialises in Children Act matters and in particular care proceedings, representing parents, children’s guardians and local authorities. She has dealt with cases involving both physical and emotional abuse. This includes serious non-accidental injuries such as multiple fractures, shake and impact head injuries, sexual abuse, neglect and fictitious illness syndrome. She is particularly skilled at dealing with ethnic minorities and those with mental ill-health, personality disorders and learning difficulties. Her expertise includes dealing with cases involving domestic violence, applying and resisting injunctions and occupation orders as well as contact and residence disputes. She regularly acts for parents who wish to relocate overseas and apply for leave to permanently remove their children from the jurisdiction and for those who wish to resist such applications as well as international child abduction, wardship and forced marriage cases.

Charlotte Street

Charlotte Street enjoys a broad family law practice, encompassing all aspects of public and private law, children and money, injunctive relief and emergency applications. Charlotte appears at Family Proceedings Court, County Court and High Court levels and regularly represents parents in care proceedings. She has been instructed in a number of lengthy and complex disputes, involving allegations of physical abuse. Charlotte has also been instructed by extended family members and prospective adopters regarding special guardianship and adoption applications. In respect of private late applications Charlotte has significant experience of residence and contact disputes. She has dealt with a number of complex cases involving S.9.5 guardians. Issues have included allegations of abuse, personality disorders and hostile resident parents. Charlotte has dealt with applications for the removal from the jurisdiction.

Jennie worked for a Family law solicitors firm in the Midlands for several years before joining the Independent Bar. She specialises in all aspects of children law with particular emphasis on public, private and international work. Jennie acts for Local Authorities, parents, children and intervenors in public law matters, including cases with an international element and where there are allegations of non-accidental injury, sexual abuse and neglect. She has been instructed in connection with the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA). In private law matters she is regularly instructed in serious and complex cases, including those on the ‘cusp’ of the public law jurisdiction, cases in which there are concurrent criminal proceedings and cases involving parental alienation. Jennie has particular experience representing vulnerable clients, including victims of domestic violence, people with current or previous drugs/alcohol misuse issues, poor mental health and learning difficulties. She has experience working with adults who require specialist advocates to help them participate fully in the Court process. Jennie is ranked as a Tier 1 Leading Junior in Legal 500 for Family and Children Law. She is described in the current edition as “tenacious, quick-thinking and persuasive” and “a strong advocate who provides realistic advice.” She accepts direct access instructions. Notable cases include: Re D (children) [2011] EWCA Civ 1743 -

Hugh is a highly experienced and well regarded specialist advocate who advises on all aspects of family law including the financial aspects of divorce, and both private and public law children matters. His work includes cases with an international aspect, and includes Schedule 1 hearings as well as advising on Pre and Post Nuptial agreements. Hugh is considered to be a leading Junior at the Family Bar having practiced in the area for over 30 years. His clear, empathetic and sensible advise endears him to clients and Judges alike. He maintains a discrete practice in the areas of contract and employment law and can advise both companies and individuals on contractual matters. In employment law his experience covers a wide range of issues including unfair dismissal and discrimination cases. Hugh spoke at the International Bar Association Conference in Madrid on the subject of the impact of the Brussels II regulation upon the resolution of international jurisdictional disputes in divorce proceedings. Child Abduction Children Law (Private) Direct Access Family Finance

Richard Tutt practises in criminal and regulatory law. He is equally at home before a jury, judges or a tribunal. He frequently appears before both the High Court and the Court of Appeal. Richard has been ranked as a ‘Leading Junior’ by Legal 500 every year since 2014. Ranked in Chambers & Partners 2023. Richard sits as a Recorder in criminal cases on the Western Circuit. He also sits as a Legally Qualified Chair for the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS). Is a regular speaker at Chambers’ CPD accredited seminars both in London and on the Western Circuit. Lectures for Central Law Training in London. Has lectured to the HSE at its explosives laboratory in Buxton and survived.

Annie Ward specialises in cases that involve issues such as financial conduct, overseas and domestic trusts, third party property interests, company shares and share options, family businesses, and inherited wealth. Annie will get involved in cases at any stage of litigation and also in the context of mediation. She regularly appears in the Family Division on children matters. Annie is a regular speaker at seminars on Inheritance Act and related claims.

Richard Wayman is a Leading Junior employment barrister who has spent a decade practising in this fast-moving area of law. Prior to this he developed extensive hands-on commercial experience of employment law as Managing Director of a long-established family printing business with 80 employees. Richard went on to read law at Magdalene College, Cambridge (Upper Second Class) and complete the Bar Professional Training Course at the City Law School (Outstanding), before being Called to the Bar and awarded the Certificate of Honour by the Middle Temple. He also holds an Honours degree from the University of St. Andrews (First Class).

Tom Wilkins has over 20 years experience dealing with criminal and motoring matters. He has developed a growing niche in Court Martial work and is happy to take instructions both here and overseas to represent service personnel. He is a pupil supervisor and this year was involved as an advocacy trainer for Circuit in respect of vulnerable witnesses. He is happy to accept work from members of the public on a Direct Access basis. Criminal Tom both prosecutes and defends the whole spectrum of criminal cases across the Circuit. He has previously defended and prosecuted serving Police officers, as well as other professionals e.g. medical doctors. He is accredited as a Grade 4 prosecutor for London, the Western and South Eastern Circuits. He is also instructed by the RASSO unit to prosecute sex offence cases within these circuits. Courts Martial He has developed a growing niche in Court Martial work and is happy to take instructions both here and overseas to represent service personnel. Road Traffic Offences Tom extensive experience dealing with motoring matters at all levels, in cases ranging from drink driving to fatalities. He has appeared in the Crown Court and Court of Appeal on numerous occasions in relation to causing death by dangerous driving. Those cases have often involved complex expert evidence relating to drink, drugs, speed or roadworthiness and sometimes very technical defences. His professional clients include a doctor successfully acquitted of being drunk in charge of a motorcycle and a Police officer, also in relation to drink driving (where the main concern was the loss of pension). He has experience of tachographs and the evidence obtained from them. Formerly practicing in London, he was instructed by the CPS there to prosecute fatal road traffic incidents e.g. an HGV driver killing a pedestrian. He now brings that experience to bear in his defence practice and is currently instructed as leading counsel to defend a Royal Engineer in respect of gross negligence manslaughter in Camp Bastion involving a Caterpillar 938 wheel loader. The case raises health and safety issues relating to the MOD’s system of work and where responsibility lies within a team.

Cordelia Williams

Cordelia is a family practitioner who specialises in financial remedies and private law children matters. She is regularly instructed in complex disputes, often appearing against senior barristers of leading family chambers. She is listed in The Legal 500 2026 as a ‘leading junior’. She has experience of all stages of proceedings in financial remedies, private children, care and injunctive proceedings. She has successfully acted in both children and finance appeals. She provides written advice in all areas of family law, including those with an international element.

Nicholas Williamson

Nicholas Williamson experience lies in all aspects of family legal issues. He handles private and public law Children Act matters and litigation between unmarried couples. His Children Act practice includes disputes about residence, contact and removal of children from the jurisdiction. He also regularly represents parents in care proceedings. Nick appears regularly in front of Circuit and District Judges in the Principal Registry and in a wide number of County Courts as well as representing clients in the Family Proceedings Court.